Prolific Academic Survey Alerts

Miró

nic2075 wrote: »

Got to the end of the mindfulness one and it didn't give me a code. Hope it doesn't come up as timed out. I seem to have a few like that. Not sure if I'm doing something wrong? One last night just went to a page to set up a survey monkey page. No code. Looking now and it said timed out.

I didn't get a code either but it usually doesn't matter.....hope it''s the case with this one! Seems to be listed in my Submissions OK.

[Deleted User]

I didn't even get the study! It asked if I had been a meditation or mindfulness coach or something like that so I said no, and it said thanks your response has been recorded and that was it

BookmobileBadGirl

I am 12p away from my next £20 and surveys have been sparse for me

mikep22

nic2075 wrote: »

Got to the end of the mindfulness one and it didn't give me a code. Hope it doesn't come up as timed out. I seem to have a few like that. Not sure if I'm doing something wrong? One last night just went to a page to set up a survey monkey page. No code. Looking now and it said timed out.

Why would it have timed out?

Sometimes they give you a link to end the study and a link back to Prolific. But I didnt get a code either, though I did take a screeny when I realised I didnt get a code.

Its good practice to go into Prolific and make sure the survey has actually ended.

mikep22

Greetings from Prolific Academic,
Your submission for Judgement of Nutrition Information 3 has been rejected by the researcher. The researcher has provided the following reason:

Dear participant, I am rejecting your submission to my study "Judgement of Nutrition Information 3" (xx). Unfortunately, I am not satisfied with the quality of the data you provided. Your response was flagged as careless. You indicated that low amounts are larger than high ones. Please contact me if you wish to contest this rejection. Apologies and regards, marie Juanchich

What the?? Shes had a slightly stinging response. I got 6/8 on the questions and apparently a bonus of 66p! How can that be "careless". #sake.

allison445

mikep22 wrote: »

Greetings from Prolific Academic,
Your submission for Judgement of Nutrition Information 3 has been rejected by the researcher. The researcher has provided the following reason:

Dear participant, I am rejecting your submission to my study "Judgement of Nutrition Information 3" (xx). Unfortunately, I am not satisfied with the quality of the data you provided. Your response was flagged as careless. You indicated that low amounts are larger than high ones. Please contact me if you wish to contest this rejection. Apologies and regards, marie Juanchich

What the?? Shes had a slightly stinging response. I got 6/8 on the questions and apparently a bonus of 66p! How can that be "careless". #sake.

Not holding out much hope in getting paid for this myself my bonus was less than yours but what's really annoying is I am sure I got them all right :rotfl:

Miró

mikep22 wrote: »

Greetings from Prolific Academic,
Your submission for Judgement of Nutrition Information 3 has been rejected by the researcher. The researcher has provided the following reason:

Dear participant, I am rejecting your submission to my study "Judgement of Nutrition Information 3" (xx). Unfortunately, I am not satisfied with the quality of the data you provided. Your response was flagged as careless. You indicated that low amounts are larger than high ones. Please contact me if you wish to contest this rejection. Apologies and regards, marie Juanchich

What the?? Shes had a slightly stinging response. I got 6/8 on the questions and apparently a bonus of 66p! How can that be "careless". #sake.

Not much hope for me then...I did it at 6.45 this morning when half asleep!!

mikep22

Mir! wrote: »

Not much hope for me then...I did it at 6.45 this morning when half asleep!!

Apparently the values she is on about, are the what I think high and low fat constitute and that they werent far enough apart. !!!!!!. Ignore the fact I got the majority of the questions, thats not evidence that I was paying attention at all!

mikep22

mikep22 wrote: »

Apparently the values she is on about, are the what I think high and low fat constitute and that they werent far enough apart. !!!!!!. Ignore the fact I got the majority of the questions, thats not evidence that I was paying attention at all!

She has now reversed her decision...I really dont like losing out on cash :eek::rotfl:

mikep22

Repugnant transactions
Hosted by Lasare Samartzidis
£2.10
•
25 minutes
•
£5.04/hr
•
521/850

I love the name of this.