Prolific Academic Survey Alerts

Smodlet

Do you clear out your cookies every day, Brookside? 'Cos I ain't gettin' anything.

Brookside88

Smodlet wrote: »

Do you clear out your cookies every day, Brookside? 'Cos I ain't gettin' anything.

No, never. I'll say a little prayer to the prolific gods for you

mikep22

Brookside88 wrote: »

No, never. I'll say a little prayer to the prolific gods for you

I've had 2. One was about computing and my experience with OS's, so I imagine I fit quite neatly into that demographic.

Brookside88

mikep22 wrote: »

I've had 2. One was about computing and my experience with OS's, so I imagine I fit quite neatly into that demographic.

The one about windows updates? Nice and quick for 2 quid wasn't it

mikep22

Brookside88 wrote: »

The one about windows updates? Nice and quick for 2 quid wasn't it

Indeed and already approved, which takes me past the £900 barrier for Prolific. :T:beer:

Brookside88

mikep22 wrote: »

Indeed and already approved, which takes me past the £900 barrier for Prolific. :T:beer:

Congratulations!

Still waiting for mine to be approved. Also still waiting for the £10.82 electric shock one to be approved from last week

Merlin's_Beard

mikep22 wrote: »

Sounds like it, I would ask for clarification and if they cannot provide it suitably, I think it puts you in a strong position to further complain to Prolific. If the researcher cannot tell you the issue, then they are lacking the evidence to reject. Clearly if what you have written is gibberish (ie Lorem Ipsom) then they have a point, otherwise they are taking the mick.

If they want responses within certain parameters, they should probably make it clear from the outside. Else it is their fault their survey is badly designed.

Multiple choice... so no option to give an answer outside the defined parameters that the researcher set!

Which is what is really p****** me off... if I'd very clearly given them something that they didn't want (ie filling out a survey about sheep dip designed for someone who works on a farm when I had one summer job several decades ago) I'd say, fair enough, I really wasn't what you wanted and I knew it.

But presumably my responses used too many of the options available, and I ended up as the tail end of the bell curve that's dropped because I'm too many standard deviations away from the mean. But... you expect some data to do that! It's a good enough reason to exclude it from analysis, but not a good enough reason to say it's not real data!

I've emailed the researcher anyway, and I'll see what they say.

edit: success! A bit of back and forth with the researcher, and they've paid up.

Brookside88

Anyone else find their balance is really slow to update in the new site? I got an email to say approved a good half an hour before it showed in my balance on the site. Submissions seem to take an age to be added to pending balance too

Chrisv

Clothing consumption study / Part 4 (out of 8)
Reward : £ 1.70
Avg. Reward Per Hour : £5.10/hr
Available Places : 132/132
Maximum Allowed Time : 45mins
Avg. Completion Time : 20mins

mikep22

Merlin's_Beard wrote: »

Multiple choice... so no option to give an answer outside the defined parameters that the researcher set!

Which is what is really p****** me off... if I'd very clearly given them something that they didn't want (ie filling out a survey about sheep dip designed for someone who works on a farm when I had one summer job several decades ago) I'd say, fair enough, I really wasn't what you wanted and I knew it.

But presumably my responses used too many of the options available, and I ended up as the tail end of the bell curve that's dropped because I'm too many standard deviations away from the mean. But... you expect some data to do that! It's a good enough reason to exclude it from analysis, but not a good enough reason to say it's not real data!

I've emailed the researcher anyway, and I'll see what they say.

edit: success! A bit of back and forth with the researcher, and they've paid up.

If its multiple choice then they should accept all eventualities outside of attention checks tbf...