Empolyment Tribunal

libi

Comms69 wrote: »

What the victim wants is irrelevant.


It sounds like something WAS said, either out of context or misheard/spoken.

Was said or not, cannot be prove and because my word has no credit i`ve lost my job.
And seems like all was fair and square. Bad luck, thanks for the advice.

cmthephoenix

Comms69 wrote: »

What the victim wants is irrelevant.


It sounds like something WAS said, either out of context or misheard/spoken.

That's how it's seeming to me as well. OP remember it's always more about how it's taken about what was said and that changes between cultures as well. In Poland a white girl going out with a black guy would be looked upon, in China a tall white girl would forever be stopped asking to have her photo taken, in Singapore same sex holding hands in public would be a no - cultures matter.

sangie595

I never bet on horses. I don't buy lottery tickets. But I do bet good on disciplinaries... And I bet that your third person isn't telling the entire truth here. Already leaving, and with some sort of payment? And his statement went missing? No way, Jose! The employer had an opportunity to get rid of them at no cost at all.....

So I will bet that the statement was reserved (not used directly in the hearing) on the grounds of confidentiality and putting the person at risk. And that statement confirmed something along the lines of what the allegation was. And that is why the employer believed the allegation and not you. Why they might did that - whether they broke ranks because you weren't telling the whole truth, or for some other reason, I don't know. But do not believe the version that they got let out of it because they were leaving anyway and due a payment. That is less credible than anything else you've said! I'm sure you believed it, but I don't.

Leigh6873

I have to agree iv been everywere and bin threw four case managments and researched every act but its your pleadings bein write i sent numourous pleadings and the pcp thing drove me mad but its now clicked and s20 21 as gon to hearing and have had my bundle sent so i can comment upon and send my disclosure . Im confused as thers no minuites took for interview or the change of three roles and worked on four care units and the pcp is to move me to another role the disadvantage was the area the role was in due to harrastment and breakdown and the adjustment was to stay on the unit id settled on will this mean burdon has gone to them to prove 109 (4) eqa 2010 im terrified of saying wrong term the role was i vacent role id refused to aply for to they are playing dirty tricks denying it but iv got msges stating opposite to thier statements sorry goin on i feel like im on a game show try guess right legislation any advice over disclosure please xx

sangie595

Leigh6873 wrote: »

I have to agree iv been everywere and bin threw four case managments and researched every act but its your pleadings bein write i sent numourous pleadings and the pcp thing drove me mad but its now clicked and s20 21 as gon to hearing and have had my bundle sent so i can comment upon and send my disclosure . Im confused as thers no minuites took for interview or the change of three roles and worked on four care units and the pcp is to move me to another role the disadvantage was the area the role was in due to harrastment and breakdown and the adjustment was to stay on the unit id settled on will this mean burdon has gone to them to prove 109 (4) eqa 2010 im terrified of saying wrong term the role was i vacent role id refused to aply for to they are playing dirty tricks denying it but iv got msges stating opposite to thier statements sorry goin on i feel like im on a game show try guess right legislation any advice over disclosure please xx

Pardon? I have no idea at all what you are talking about.

Leigh6873

Sorry first post didnt read all other advise from other lol no wonder u thought that was saying it to first message lol