We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Offered lovely house with a problem, to buy or not to buy, that is the question.

124»

Comments

  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Mgman1965 wrote: »

    C/ Has been on the market for £375k for 6 months without a real sniff of genuine interest (it's got a big garden to the side with the brook running by and with good frontage and told a few developers wanted it, hoping I suppose to demolish it and put a mini estate on its land and make a killing as no uplift clause, pull out as soon as they realise it won't happen as was refused a few years ago due to flooding ).
    BIL says I could likely have it for around the 250k mark.
    If the village is picturesque, the reason for refusal might be more to do with overdevelopment of the plot where builders are concerned. A well-off private individual might not have the same problem, because they could design a single replacement dwelling to suit. It probably depends on the aesthetic value of the existing cottage, because there's a sound agument for replacement otherwise.

    We once looked at a flood-prone building plot in a village that isn't very picturesque. The council were insisting on landscaping, using a berm to protect the property and define its raised site, but we thought that there might be other solutions too, like an undercroft.

    However, many large waterside trees, all protected and blocking light from the site, were what killed it for us.....that and a nearby low-quality housing estate. We didn't bid.

    The house eventually built on that site sits on the berm, but part juts out, raised up on concrete piers. A concrete deck continues almost to the stream. The effect is really good.

    However, all the trees are still there! :(
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.