We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Two weeks to completion - garden flooded!
Comments
-
alhenderson wrote: »I thought it would be the buyer's responsibility, but I asked our solicitors and they said it was probably ours! Might all be a moot point anyway, just talked to the Anglia Water man, and it looks like the problem is with the water main on the path outside our garden. Which would be good news! Flow has abated somewhat, too, so not looking too bad.
If it's the mains pipe, do we have any recourse if the drive needs repairing? Or is that down to our insurance?
Al
The contract you exchanged with your buyer probably has words along the lines of you providing the property on completion in the same state as it was at exchange. Therefore, if it wasn't Anglian's responsibility, it would be yours.
My understanding is that the reason the buyer has buildings insurance from exchange, is the buyer's mortgage company worrying that if damage occurs you might declare bankruptcy to get out of fixing it. In reality this is very unlikely, as it would require the damage to be greater than the equity in your house, and you to be desperate enough to prefer bankruptcy. But the buyer's mortgage company has no idea of your financial state, so they require insurance to cover their behinds.0 -
The contract you exchanged with your buyer probably has words along the lines of you providing the property on completion in the same state as it was at exchange. Therefore, if it wasn't Anglian's responsibility, it would be yours.
My understanding is that the reason the buyer has buildings insurance from exchange, is the buyer's mortgage company worrying that if damage occurs you might declare bankruptcy to get out of fixing it. In reality this is very unlikely, as it would require the damage to be greater than the equity in your house, and you to be desperate enough to prefer bankruptcy. But the buyer's mortgage company has no idea of your financial state, so they require insurance to cover their behinds.
Thanks for that. I did wonder why I needed to keep my buildings insurance if the buyer also had it.
Anglian Water are digging up the path outside the house as we speak, so hopefully everything can dry out and I can get back to packing boxes
Al.0 -
The contract you exchanged with your buyer probably has words along the lines of you providing the property on completion in the same state as it was at exchange. Therefore, if it wasn't Anglian's responsibility, it would be yours.
<snip>
Your info is out of date - it changed with the 5th Edition of the Standard Conditions of Sale (which have been around since about 2011).
As this solicitor explains, risk passes to the buyer on exchange of contracts. So the water damage is the buyer's responsibility.
Even if if property is burnt to the ground between exchange and completion, the buyer still has to buy it:CHANGES MADE BY THE FIFTH EDITION OF THE STANDARD CONDITIONS OF SALE
Probably the most important change made by the fifth edition is the amendment of SCS 5.1 to provide for the risk to pass to the buyer on exchange, as it would under the general law. That contrasts with the position in each of the previous editions of the SCS, under which SCS 5.1 provided that the seller retained the risk until completion (though without being under any obligation to insure) and the buyer was given the right to rescind if at any time before completion the physical state of the property made it unusable for its purpose at the date of the contract.
...
The contract does not oblige the buyer to insure the property, but the buyer will normally be well-advised to do so, since, in contrast to the position under the earlier editions, he will now be obliged to complete even if the property is reduced to a smoking ruin between exchange and the completion date.
Link: http://www.radcliffechambers.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Handout_merged_Handout.pdf0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards