We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Fair trade practice opening new claim case

Hi,
Can anyone provide me with some advice?
I used a third party to claim for my ppi called fair trade practice. This was under the previous mis-selling of ppi and the Plevin ruling was not yet ruled in.
I had won some cases and paid them their commission but I had one case which had to go to the financial ombudsman.
I finally received a letter from fair trade practice informing me that the ombudsman had ruled in favour of the lender and I was unsuccessful. I had the option to appeal but chose not to and the case was closed. I had an email to confirm all cases were solved.
Months later, I receive an email confirming that the ombudsman have ruled in my favour.
Needless to say I was confused as it was all over.
I looked closely and noticed that there was a new claim number and it seems fair trade practice reopened the claim without my permission and started a new case under the Plevin ruling.
I never gave them permission for this.
Question is? Do I have to pay them commission? I did not give them permission to open that case up under a new claim for a new ruling!

Comments

  • I used a third party to claim for my ppi called fair trade practice . . .<snip>
    I never gave them permission for this.
    Check the agreement, you might find you signed to say they could represent you in all future claims. Unless you cancelled . .
  • The closet thing I could find in t&c’s was along the lines of the lender reinvestigates the claim.
    As this had a new claim number, it’s not investigating an old claim but surely a new claim that they had no right to do.
    If anyone else has had a similar experience and could let me know the outcome, that would be very useful.
  • -taff
    -taff Posts: 15,585 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Plevin would have eventually been checked agasint your complaint because it was rejected.
    Try this thread
    https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5757645
    Non me fac calcitrare tuum culi
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.