We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Renunciation
[Deleted User]
Posts: 0 Newbie
After an executor has signed a deed of renunciation, whose responsibility is it to find an alternative executor?
0
Comments
-
Sorry, don't have the answer but it will be interesting to know.0
-
-
The answer is no one, although it would be in the interest of the major benificiaries to take it on or appoint someone to do so.0
-
They can't just appoint someone. They have to do per my post #3.Keep_pedalling wrote: »The answer is no one, although it would be in the interest of the major benificiaries to take it on or appoint someone to do so.0 -
So what happens if nobody wants the job?0
-
In cases where the estate is obviously insolvent the general advice is not to administer it, so executors should renounce. It would then be up to creditors to decide if there was any point becoming administrators in order to get a few pence in the pound of the money they are owed. If not the estate stays unadministered.
If there's no money the state pay for the funeral and nobody winds up the estate.
If an estate is solvent it's up to the beneficiaries to get the estate administered if they want their money/assets. If not the money stays in the bank and any property is left to rot. But no-one polices this and no third party will usually get involved unless directly affected (creditors etc).0 -
-
Yorkshireman99 wrote: »What assets does the estate have?
About £13k in cash, and contents of a 1 bed flat AFAIK.0 -
In this case most beneficiaries presumably want their bequests, but they're refusing to administer because third parties have been involved. In the mean time rent is eroding the estate, and the landlord wants his property vacated.In cases where the estate is obviously insolvent the general advice is not to administer it, so executors should renounce. It would then be up to creditors to decide if there was any point becoming administrators in order to get a few pence in the pound of the money they are owed. If not the estate stays unadministered.
If there's no money the state pay for the funeral and nobody winds up the estate.
If an estate is solvent it's up to the beneficiaries to get the estate administered if they want their money/assets. If not the money stays in the bank and any property is left to rot. But no-one polices this and no third party will usually get involved unless directly affected (creditors etc).0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
