Neither Driver nor Keeper

Coupon-mad

Hooray, this one was ridiculous! You were not even the driver or the keeper:

In my letter to TPS of 24th November 2017, I made it clear that I discovered the Parking Charge Notice affixed to the vehicle in question whilst it was parked in my driveway, I returned the notice to TPS as a favour due the registered keeper being unavailable. As I am under no obligation to determine who was driving the vehicle, at the time that the notice was affixed to the vehicle and there was no information relating to who was authorised to remove the notice from the vehicle, I returned the notice (unopened) to owner of the notice (which could be seen on the notice without removing it from the clear pocket).

Do you have a link or any information about the 'Gemini Parking' decision.

Just out of interest, it was in 'POPLA Decisions' last year, so it's on this forum in that sticky. And it's the only case we know of where POPLA reversed the decision! It was hopelessly wrong, clearly a new Adjudicator making unchecked 'decisions' too soon, before they understood Schedule 4 and keeper liability.

Computersaysno

Surely the trick is to reply to the PPC and name your uncle in Zimbabwe as the driver.......that's what a lot of people do.

Keycare

I think I may have interrupted their process, as most people either pay up or ignore. The fact that I contacted them may have meant that they made assumptions.