We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Finance options for 13 year old banger
Comments
-
If you'd picked this last year your £500 would now be over £700
http://www.hl.co.uk/shares/shares-search-results/s/scottish-mortgage-it-ordinary-shares-5p
Yes, and if I'd known what was going to win the Grand National I'd have got £7,500 for my £500.0 -
Yes, and if I'd known what was going to win the Grand National I'd have got £7,500 for my £500.
You’d probably be a lot better gambling on some political event where the outcome is more obvious. For instance, Hillary Clinton was never going to lose and there was no way brexit was going to win.
There’s where I went wrong in life - I failed to put everything on a trump/brexit double. Damn. The regret.“What means that trump?” Timon of Athens by William Shakespeare0 -
Car54 -. Yes, and if I'd known what was going to win the Grand National I'd have got £7,500 for my £500.
Choosing a fund isn't gambling though, because the odds are in your favour, mathematically you expect a profit and have good reason to, it's risky of course, and some do better than others, but most equities generally have done very well over history - if you're diversified and long term then you're relying more on probability than luckThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0 -
Or, indeed, Leicester to win the Premiership!0
-
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Car54 -
Choosing a fund isn't gambling though, because the odds are in your favour, mathematically you expect a profit and have good reason to, it's risky of course, and some do better than others, but most equities generally have done very well over history - if you're diversified and long term then you're relying more on probability than luck
Not really. A lot never make anything. Also we haven’t had a crash in a while and there’s been a steady rise for quite some time. There will be a reversal some time.
In a gamble, you could occasionally do well with a structured bet. In a Wimbledon tennis final, someone is going to win. It’s often possible to bet on Serena with one company and Venus at another ( for example), leaving you in a position where you either break even or lift a smaller profit. Apparently.“What means that trump?” Timon of Athens by William Shakespeare0 -
Don't bother. You've got a £500 car at best. You could just put £100 into VLS a month and hit that £500 in no time and have no interest to pay.This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
Qwertyuiop - the ones that never make anything usually have concentrated their risk in individual companies and time the market, something nobody can do wellThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
-
MatthewAinsworth wrote: »Qwertyuiop - the ones that never make anything usually have concentrated their risk in individual companies and time the market, something nobody can do well
Do you actually have any knowledge in this area? Or are you naïvely believing what certain agents are telling you. If you could make a fortune from a small investment, why would you not avoid the hassle of a short term expensive loan (and there's nothing else when it comes to logbook loans) and either borrow from a mainstream lender and pay it off once you've made your fortune or from a friend who you pay back with interest or partner with a friend and split the proceeds.
I see a over reliance on the ups and a dismissal of the downs of the financial markets.
I can see tears on the horizon if you sink money into this above your head. In short if you need to borrow to make this investment, can you actually afford to take the risk?
It's no good saying that you won't lose money, and the risk doesn't apply to you. To make a large fortune, you have to be less cautious and NOT spread your risks. There is no such thing as a risk free investment.0 -
qwert_yuiop wrote: »Not really. A lot never make anything. Also we haven’t had a crash in a while and there’s been a steady rise for quite some time.
.
Both parts are just not true. We're straying away from cars here but there have been drops over the last few years but recovered again very quickly. It's also untrue that a lot of funds never make anything. Can you provide any evidence or links for your claim?
Of course there will be, that's the nature of investing. That doesn't mean you'll lose money - just that the value might be lower at certain points. Even with a massive crash like 2008/9 the markets had recovered within 2 yearsqwert_yuiop wrote: »There will be a reversal some time.
.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
Mercdriver - I made about 18% since I started, learning from the Monevator blog
I didn't realise how expensive logbook loans were and I was only looking into my options for pushing this further, like I said I would never borrow at a higher rate than I expect to get, I won't even take out a margin loan at 8% because I don't want the investment marked to market (they would sell it if your deposit drops too low for the loan- aka a margin call) - I have successfully used 0% credit cards to do it and made about £200 but it hasn't done any favours for my credit rating so I'm winding that down.
A margin loan doesn't go on your credit record and I didn't know if car finance would
I fully expect a crash at some point soon but don't believe in market timing, I have emergency funds as well as income and can wait out the next crash for however long it takes to recover. I wouldn't take out credit I couldn't afford - although like anyone with a mortgage I can't go without a job forever if I lost it, however I expect to find a job that pays just enough quite quickly if I needed to, I'd use agencies to get started quickly if that happened
I reckon that equities dividends is more secure than jobs income because it's spread over many more companies, so by increasing my investment in reducing my overall risk, especially long termThis is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

