We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
IE Legal Total Parking Solutions
Options
Comments
-
Have you attempted to engage with the property manager???
they could kill this dead, all you need is either a we dont support this being taken forward through the courts, and/or an outright cancellationFrom the Plain Language Commission:
"The BPA has surely become one of the most socially dangerous organisations in the UK"0 -
Thanks, updated link, if beamerguy would be kind enough to update his links.0
-
Latest update to the BPA CoP was just posted today.
Version 7 January 2018
hxxp://www.britishparking.co.uk/Code-of-Practice-and-Compliance-Monitoring
Just for clarity, the relevant CoP is the one that was in effect at the time of the alleged event, which would be version 6.
Also, in addition to your other comments about ANPR, failing to state what the data will be used for is an ICO breach.I married my cousin. I had to...I don't have a sister.All my screwdrivers are cordless."You're Safety Is My Primary Concern Dear" - Laks0 -
echo6
"If any one is interested I have posted a video of the drive into the car park, twilight hours."
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wJ0ebTySOAnklGJYQls63kW6I60C1gGo/view?usp=sharing[/QUOTE]0 -
Two further letters received today, one a PRE-COURT NOTICE similar to the FINAL-DEMANDS for £110.
The other letter in response to the one I wrote to them on the 27th. Mainly disagreeing with the points I raised.
The following paragraph raised an eye brow from me, the previous point regarding POFA.Before we can deal with this point, as you are referring to a student parking permit,
please confirm it was you / your son, who was in fact driving the vehicle. If a third party drove the vehicle, please identify them. Please don't expect to play silly games about this based on internet lawyers. We will ask your son in court (as no doubt will the judge) and it will be a contempt of court, punishable by up to two years imprisonment to give a false answer.
You can refuse to answer if you wish, but then we would be entitled to ask the court to draw inferences, and you'd also annoy the judge which is not a good idea. Once you confirm the driver was the student permit holder, we can consider the other points your raise.
I'm not sure if I should respond to this letter as I E Legal have already initiated the Pre Action Protocol.
Oh! and they also pointed to this CCJ for one of their cases at Swansea
hxxps://drive.google.com/open?id=18cp46aTqWsTX_kTAxvysQwcWL_FX3Ol40 -
I will be responding to the letter, but there after will defer the solicitor to the Pre-Action Protocol as they initiated it. I still hold the view that the last letter is threatening and attempt at intimidation and coercion when quoting a case they won which contains no further details except for the outcome. I will complain on this point.
Surprised that I have had no response here, and was hoping for some feedback, thoughts?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards