IE Legal Total Parking Solutions

Half_way

Have you attempted to engage with the property manager???
they could kill this dead, all you need is either a we dont support this being taken forward through the courts, and/or an outright cancellation

echo6

Thanks, updated link, if beamerguy would be kind enough to update his links.

echo6

Half_way wrote: »

Have you attempted to engage with the property manager???

Yes, post #32 refers, and I have responded. awaiting a further reply.

I'm also in the process of writing to Assembly Members at the Welsh Assembly Government.

KeithP

echo6 wrote: »

Thanks, updated link, if beamerguy would be kind enough to update his links.

The last paragraph on the third page still identifies your unique events.

echo6

KeithP wrote: »

The last paragraph on the third page still identifies your unique events.

Thanks! Updated all to google drive links.

Fruitcake

echo6 wrote: »

Latest update to the BPA CoP was just posted today.

Version 7 January 2018

hxxp://www.britishparking.co.uk/Code-of-Practice-and-Compliance-Monitoring

Just for clarity, the relevant CoP is the one that was in effect at the time of the alleged event, which would be version 6.

Also, in addition to your other comments about ANPR, failing to state what the data will be used for is an ICO breach.

beamerguy

echo6
"If any one is interested I have posted a video of the drive into the car park, twilight hours."

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1wJ0ebTySOAnklGJYQls63kW6I60C1gGo/view?usp=sharing[/QUOTE]

echo6

Two further letters received today, one a PRE-COURT NOTICE similar to the FINAL-DEMANDS for £110.

The other letter in response to the one I wrote to them on the 27th. Mainly disagreeing with the points I raised.

The following paragraph raised an eye brow from me, the previous point regarding POFA.

Before we can deal with this point, as you are referring to a student parking permit,
please confirm it was you / your son, who was in fact driving the vehicle. If a third party drove the vehicle, please identify them. Please don't expect to play silly games about this based on internet lawyers. We will ask your son in court (as no doubt will the judge) and it will be a contempt of court, punishable by up to two years imprisonment to give a false answer.
You can refuse to answer if you wish, but then we would be entitled to ask the court to draw inferences, and you'd also annoy the judge which is not a good idea. Once you confirm the driver was the student permit holder, we can consider the other points your raise.

I'm not sure if I should respond to this letter as I E Legal have already initiated the Pre Action Protocol.

Oh! and they also pointed to this CCJ for one of their cases at Swansea

hxxps://drive.google.com/open?id=18cp46aTqWsTX_kTAxvysQwcWL_FX3Ol4

echo6

I will be responding to the letter, but there after will defer the solicitor to the Pre-Action Protocol as they initiated it. I still hold the view that the last letter is threatening and attempt at intimidation and coercion when quoting a case they won which contains no further details except for the outcome. I will complain on this point.

Surprised that I have had no response here, and was hoping for some feedback, thoughts?

Quentin

echo6 wrote: »

Surprised that I have had no response here, and was hoping for some feedback, thoughts?

Have you seen how busy it is in here?