excel nip notice - paid for wrong car park

jannor

Hi can anybody help me with this one,

A ticket was paid for a car park through Ringo for which there is a valid receipt, the driver did realise there is car park 1 and car park 2.

The car park fee was appealed against insisting that the required amount had been paid. They have rejected this (email receipt to prove payment).

Now I have intended prosecution letter saying I have to pay £100. Do I reject this or pay it. I have argued with them that the driver has intentionally paid so they cannot prove avoidance.

pogofish

You will get excellent help if you get this moved to the Parking Tickets Subforum - its futile trying to help anyone in here.

PM a board guide to get the thread moved over and whilst waiting, have a good/careful read of the Newbies Sticky at the top of that forum - it will inform you on the current state of private parking abd lay-out your options for seeing them-off.

Also, it would be wise to edit your post to remove all reference to any driver - from now on, you couch everything as coming from the keeper.

BeenThroughItAll

Just in case you're intending to write anything to the parking company, it'd be worth understanding the difference between 'did' and 'didn't'.

Yes, this is a serious point.

DoaM

Excel don't issue NIPs - they're a private company.

docmatt

BeenThroughItAll wrote: »

Just in case you're intending to write anything to the parking company, it'd be worth understanding the difference between 'did' and 'didn't'.

Yes, this is a serious point.

Ah but maybe it was supposed to be did.

Coupon-mad

jannor wrote: »

Hi can anybody help me with this one,

A ticket was paid for a car park through Ringo for which there is a valid receipt, the driver did realise there is car park 1 and car park 2.

The car park fee was appealed against insisting that the required amount had been paid. They have rejected this (email receipt to prove payment).

Now I have intended prosecution letter saying I have to pay £100. Do I reject this or pay it. I have argued with them that the driver has intentionally paid so they cannot prove avoidance.

You already have a thread from November in the parking forum, with replies that you didn't respond to:

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/5741834

If you have had a tediously predictable threatogram letter from a debt collector or BW Legal (fully expected in this letter chain, as you will have seen if you read other Excel threads there) then go back to your thread on the parking board and reply on it, telling the posters who sent the letter, but having firstly read the NEWBIES FAQS sticky thread, please.

Or better still, search the parking board (NOT here) for the exact letter - keywords being 'Excel BW Legal'.

On the parking forum, the 'win rate' in successfully defending useless PPC court cases from the likes of BW Legal is 99% wins.