We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Buyers wants separate private arrangement for part of sale value
Comments
-
For anyone in the same boat in the future... yes, I also suspected money laundering. And, at this current time, it's who suspects it who's also legally obliged to report it - they can be jailed/fined if not. It's not just who commits it.2024 wins: *must start comping again!*0
-
at this current time, it's who suspects it who's also legally obliged to report it - they can be jailed/fined if not. It's not just who commits it.0
-
Only if you're regulated, surely? I don't think Joe Public is obliged to grass on money launderers (though handling money and "asking no questions" is more troublesome).2024 wins: *must start comping again!*0
-
-
Hi,
I thought I would update everyone. This is such a mess. I went back to the agent and said
"tell the buyer I can only accept 435 if its a single contract stated for that value and we must exchange by x date because this has been going on long enough. I can't do this two separate contract thing. My solicitor and conveyancer won't accept it any other way".
Agent came back to me and said "the buyer can only do the 435 if its via the two arrangement thing, they only want to put 410 on the contract. Why don't you change your conveyancer and go find another one and only mention the 410 contract to them and we'll still find another way for the remaining 25K!!".
I stood my ground and said no, its not going to happen. I even said "my solicitors had advised me it could be seen as fraud so I can't do it"
The agent said that I was now suggesting that I wasn't willing to proceed with the suggested approach that basically I was "withdrawing from sale" and that I would be liable for the half agency fees even though the property hadn't sold. I am so livid I'm shaking. I had originally accepted their offer of 445K, it wasn't my fault they couldn't get a BTL mortgage to match. I was even willing to accept 435K but I couldn't agree to this 'two separate arrangement thing' on advice of my solicitor and now they're saying that if I withdraw from the sale then I need to pay the agency fees. It feels like blackmail - like somehow I'm the one being unreasonable for not bending the rules.
The agent is asking me to now put in writing that I don't want to proceed with the sale. I think I'll be talking to my solicitor first.0 -
[FONT=Verdana, sans-serif]There is no way, in this situation, a Court would support your EA claim for a fee. [/FONT]0
-
I would say that I was happy to proceed with a buyer who could pay the agreed price as one contract covering the entire purchase price. Also, bear in mind that any fees are probably only payable when they have a ready, willing and able buyer and from all accounts the buyer is not able to complete at the agreed price without trying to put together some convoluted deal. I wouldn't proceed on that basis and if they wanted half the fee would tell them to sue me.0
-
seeking786 wrote: »The agent is asking me to now put in writing that I don't want to proceed with the sale.
Don't fall into that trap.
Just put in writing that you are ready, willing and able to sell your property to the buyer for £435k, and your solicitor is ready to exchange contracts at that price.
In your position, I would take a step back from the 'weird £25k arrangement' - and just ignore it, and not enter into any discussion about it.0 -
I cannot agree more with the previous three posts. Stand your ground. The agent will NOT be able to claim anything from you for not proceeding with this "£410K plus shady extra £25K" offer. To even try, they'd have to admit, in court, that they were party to defrauding HMRC, since the buyer wouldn't be paying stamp duty on the £25K either. Obviously, they're not going to do that, so they're not going to take this further unless you do something silly like put in writing that you're withdrawing from the sale0
-
If the sale doesn't go through it's time to change agents.
So, in your letter request a list of names of potential buyers that they have introduced the house to.Gather ye rosebuds while ye may0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards