PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Landlord kicking up long-term tenant

Hi all,

My parents are in a bit of a situation where the landlord has decided to kick them out with little notice after 15 years of being there. They had some rent-flow hiccups but rectified quickly and currently there are no arrears nor do they foresee any issues. However, because of this hiccup, the landlord for whatever reason has decided they need to go. The eviction letter was sent 2 months prior but after speaking to the landlord it was thought that was only to bring the rent flow back to normal however recently they've come to know that the eviction letter was not a threat and the landlord has for whatever reason decided to stick to it. Landlord wants parents out in the next few days but (a) they are older now so will not be able to easily move now - will take time (b) gathering 15 years of things is not easy so will take time anyway.

Do they have any options other than to leave? Really worried for them.

Thanks
«1345

Comments

  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    Has the landlord been to court? If not, then they don't have to leave
  • HampshireH
    HampshireH Posts: 4,955 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    In the meantime check it was served correctly & look for a new place for them to live once the 'LL has gone go court .

    A bit naive to assume it was a threat. Did they ever ask the Landlord once it was served?
  • nudda
    nudda Posts: 117 Forumite
    It was naive but LL gae indication verbally they will retract the eviction and that it was only because of the rent flow issues, where the property mgmt company sent it out automatically.

    No it hasn't gone to court at all. I have indeed started looking for a different place for them to live but this is not a quick process as we all know.

    It's a nightmare situation because xmas is effectively ruined ...
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    nudda wrote: »
    It was naive but LL gae indication verbally they will retract the eviction and that it was only because of the rent flow issues, where the property mgmt company sent it out automatically.

    No it hasn't gone to court at all. I have indeed started looking for a different place for them to live but this is not a quick process as we all know.

    It's a nightmare situation because xmas is effectively ruined ...
    If it hasn't gone to court then you still have quite a bit of time. (in theory upto 31 weeks, based upon average eviction times) - realistically I'd plan for 6-8 weeks
  • nudda
    nudda Posts: 117 Forumite
    also, how can I check "it was served correctly".
    Currently reading :
    https://www.gov.uk/private-renting-evictions
    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1988/50/contents
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    There's a number of criteria for a notice to be correct, the main ones are that the deposit is protected.


    However, was this a s.8 or s.21 notice?
  • aneary
    aneary Posts: 921 Forumite
    Comms69 wrote: »
    There's a number of criteria for a notice to be correct, the main ones are that the deposit is protected.


    However, was this a s.8 or s.21 notice?

    The deposit doesn't need to be protected they have been in the house since 2002 the deposit protection scheme was only introduced in 2006/2007. I'm sure GM will give the correct date.
  • Comms69
    Comms69 Posts: 14,229 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Third Anniversary Name Dropper
    aneary wrote: »
    The deposit doesn't need to be protected they have been in the house since 2002 the deposit protection scheme was only introduced in 2006/2007. I'm sure GM will give the correct date.



    Yes but since then all deposit must be protected.
  • nudda
    nudda Posts: 117 Forumite
    The tenancy contract renewed each year, so I think its an AST.
    I will check in the contract whether the deposit was protected or not.
    Also will check what kind of notice it was.


    Have read some more information here:
    https://www.citizensadvice.org.uk/housing/renting-privately/during-your-tenancy/if-you-get-a-section-21-notice/
  • aneary
    aneary Posts: 921 Forumite
    In this case the deposit much be protected
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.