We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

H&L "Creation fees" when fund switching

13

Comments

  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    I think you will find they are all doing it, one way or another. Transaction costs and stamp duty are unavoidable no matter how an investment is wrapped up.

    What is infuriating is that most people assume these charges are included in the anniual management charge.They aren't, they are extra charges.

    The advantage to holding shares directly is that although you pay these costs, they are transparent and you can choose a low cost broker. You can also minimise the cost by not trading often and of course you don't pay anything on top - no AMC. It makes a big difference over the years.
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,291 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    I think you will find they are all doing it, one way or another. Transaction costs and stamp duty are unavoidable no matter how an investment is wrapped up.

    They are not.

    I checked my last few fund switches and the only charges i paid were the 0.25% switching fee and on some funds a dilution levy. The amount paid into the new fund was the exact difference after those. Most didnt have the dilution levy and the only charge was 0.25%. Thats very different to the 1% wombat is saying.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • wombat42_2
    wombat42_2 Posts: 1,312 Forumite
    RayWolfe wrote: »
    Wombat:
    Read my message above; No.16

    Yes i read that post. It is incidental who pockets the money, the fact remains I still have to pay it. It seems incredible that it is over and above the bid/offer spread of 5% to 5.5% (which is usually completely discounted by HL). Why do we hear nothing about these extra charges if you went to the UT company and bought from them direct ? The charges seem to differ for each UT there ought to be somewhere information on what these charges are.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    wombat42, just to be sure: these are bare unit trusts in a Vantage fund account, not in their ISA or SIPP wrapper? If not please say exactly which wrapper and give an example with the quoted bid and offer prices on the day of the purchase or sale, after it happened.
  • wombat42_2
    wombat42_2 Posts: 1,312 Forumite
    jamesd wrote: »
    wombat42, just to be sure: these are bare unit trusts in a Vantage fund account, not in their ISA or SIPP wrapper? If not please say exactly which wrapper and give an example with the quoted bid and offer prices on the day of the purchase or sale, after it happened.

    We are talking unit trusts in ISA/PEP wrappers with HL. Immediately after a switch was done there was a negative percentage displayed against the ISA/PEP on the HL online account which differed for each transaction but tended to be about 1% or 0.8%. I didnt make a note of them so cant remember the exact amounts. It wasnt the movement on that day for the unit trust as the unit trust prices all went up.

    The switches were:
    1/Jupiter China Acc to Threadneedle China Opps Acc
    2/ Threadneedle China Opps Acc to Neptune Global Equity Acc
    3/ Neptune Global Equity Acc to Artemis Global Growth Acc
  • EdInvestor
    EdInvestor Posts: 15,749 Forumite
    wombat42 wrote: »
    The switches were:
    1/Jupiter China Acc to Threadneedle China Opps Acc
    2/ Threadneedle China Opps Acc to Neptune Global Equity Acc
    3/ Neptune Global Equity Acc to Artemis Global Growth Acc


    Perhaps I'm missing something (CGT related perhaps?) but wouldn't it have been easier just to move the Jupiter fund money to the Artemis fund?
    Trying to keep it simple...;)
  • wombat42_2
    wombat42_2 Posts: 1,312 Forumite
    EdInvestor wrote: »
    Perhaps I'm missing something (CGT related perhaps?) but wouldn't it have been easier just to move the Jupiter fund money to the Artemis fund?

    The switches were separated by a few weeks and I switched as my fund knowledge and the market developed. The idea of moving into Global funds never occurred to me originally and also I only switched 50% of Neptune into Artemis. I plan to stay with Artemis and Neptune for the next 10 years if possible.
  • RayWolfe
    RayWolfe Posts: 3,045 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    H-L don't update their fund prices until 8 or 9 in the evening as do most of the pricing sites like Morningstar, etc. Are you sure you haven't seen the difference between the price you got and "yesterdays" price which would be shown on the website until the evening?
    I do switches with H-L and I promise you that I would not accept a difference of quoted price and bid/offer price of anything approaching 1%; maybe 0.1%.
    Here's a way to check: compare the price on your contract note with the historic price on the providers web site ... bear in mind that a deal time of 8 o'clock on the 21st will be the rate at 12 o'clock (or 10 or 11 depending upon when the manager sets the price) the previous day.
    Hope that helps.
  • jamesd
    jamesd Posts: 26,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    For the Artemis transaction I have the daily prices so if you were to post the dates of sale and purchase and the amounts involved from the transaction notes I could check that. You'd expect a 0.25% lower valuation on the Artemis fund than the money spent because that's the residual difference between bid and offer after their discounting.

    I've checked on each buy and sell transaction I've done with HL in their ISA wrapper and have never noticed a discrepancy between the revenue from a sale and the value of a purchase that wasn't accounted for by any residual difference between bid and offer prices after their discount.
  • wombat42_2
    wombat42_2 Posts: 1,312 Forumite
    jamesd wrote: »
    For the Artemis transaction I have the daily prices so if you were to post the dates of sale and purchase and the amounts involved from the transaction notes I could check that. You'd expect a 0.25% lower valuation on the Artemis fund than the money spent because that's the residual difference between bid and offer after their discounting.

    I've checked on each buy and sell transaction I've done with HL in their ISA wrapper and have never noticed a discrepancy between the revenue from a sale and the value of a purchase that wasn't accounted for by any residual difference between bid and offer prices after their discount.

    Thanks James I will send the info as a PM to you a bit later.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.