📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Tracker fund yield - is higher better?

Options
1234568»

Comments

  • Audaxer
    Audaxer Posts: 3,547 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Linton wrote: »
    1) I dont drawdown anything other than dividends from the income portfolio, I drawdown some capital from the Growth portfolio.
    Sorry, I know you don't drawdown capital from your income portfolio. I just thought you were saying that was an option. I agree it's an option but it is not my intention to do so either, unless it was a substantial capital gain.
  • Linton wrote: »
    1) I dont drawdown anything other than dividends from the income portfolio, I drawdown some capital from the Growth portfolio.

    2) One year nearer death so a slightly smaller chance of a crashes in the meantime so you need less contingency money

    Such a "bucket" approach can be a useful tool. Sometimes it's done chronologically too. But I like to be more holistic and take dividends, capital gains and rebalance across my entire portfolio and with just 3 funds that's very easy.
    “So we beat on, boats against the current, borne back ceaselessly into the past.”
  • Eco_Miser
    Eco_Miser Posts: 4,859 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    The long term average (of equities) is inclusive of the reinvestment of dividend income.
    Not if the dividend is being taken, not invested. I wasn't talking about a published figure.
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    Not a question of income or growth. The cake cannot be eaten twice.
    Obviously. But my portfolio provides both income (the declared dividends/interest) and growth (any retained profits and other changes in valuation).
    Eco Miser
    Saving money for well over half a century
  • pip895
    pip895 Posts: 1,178 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Very crudely High Yield = High Risk.

    The link in bonds is obvious but in equities, it flows in part from yield hungry bond investors piling into high yielding equities.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,175 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    pip895 wrote: »
    Very crudely High Yield = High Risk.

    The link in bonds is obvious but in equities, it flows in part from yield hungry bond investors piling into high yielding equities.

    Very high yield (eg >8%) does generally mean high risk. But yields of say 5%-6% generally dont. Look at boring, solid, highly cash generative companies with limited opportunities for growth such as the utilities and insurance companies which often have yields in this area. Private investors are a relatively small part of the market and so their actions wont normally have a major impact. Large institutional investors would generally have less freedom to switch between bonds and equity, even if they were more interested in dividend income more than capital value which I doubt most are.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.