We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

IHT implications = Trust

I am wishing to understand the rules and implications of establishing a Trust within a will and any IHT implications. So have a hypothetical scenario:

Husband and wife with only one residence of value £1,000,000, set-up as Tenants in Common. Tenants in Common and Wills set up and signed in 2017

Joint Wills with the Trust leaving the prevailing Nil-Rate Band (currently £325K) of the house to the only child.

NOTE: I understand that the Nil-Rate Band is only applicable, as the New Residence Nil Rate Band (RNRB) of £175,000 by 2020 does not apply, as a Will that relies on such a trust will not qualify for the RNRB because the beneficiary is a trust, not a child.

The husband dies in tax year 2020 to 2021, resulting in the house being structured as per the Will (32.5% to the only child and the remaining 67.5% to his wife).

With the above hypothetical scenario, is there any IHT liability with leaving the 32.5% to the only child?

I believe the Trust referred to above is called “Life Interest Trust also known as an Interest in Possession Trust” is that correct?

I appreciate that the advice of a solicitor is required, but I need to establish in my own mind some of the possible implications.

Comments

  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    edited 6 December 2017 at 11:45AM
    you are talking about an immediate post death interest in possession trust. (IPDI is what you google, loads of example on how they work.).


    Basically the IHT and CGT position on those is as if the house was inherited by the survivor with the life interest, if a spouse they keep the transferable nil rate band and can still use both RNRB.
  • I am wishing to understand the rules and implications of establishing a Trust within a will and any IHT implications. So have a hypothetical scenario:

    Husband and wife with only one residence of value £1,000,000, set-up as Tenants in Common. Tenants in Common and Wills set up and signed in 2017

    Joint Wills with the Trust leaving the prevailing Nil-Rate Band (currently £325K) of the house to the only child.

    NOTE: I understand that the Nil-Rate Band is only applicable, as the New Residence Nil Rate Band (RNRB) of £175,000 by 2020 does not apply, as a Will that relies on such a trust will not qualify for the RNRB because the beneficiary is a trust, not a child.

    The husband dies in tax year 2020 to 2021, resulting in the house being structured as per the Will (32.5% to the only child and the remaining 67.5% to his wife).

    With the above hypothetical scenario, is there any IHT liability with leaving the 32.5% to the only child?

    I believe the Trust referred to above is called “Life Interest Trust also known as an Interest in Possession Trust” is that correct?

    I appreciate that the advice of a solicitor is required, but I need to establish in my own mind some of the possible implications.
    You need an IHT and trust specialist not a run of the mill solicitor. Find a solicitor who is a STEP member who will know much more.
  • Thanks, yes I was aware of STEP and have a local company who is a member.

    So based on my readings of IPDI trusts and my above hypothetical scenario, no IHT is due until the death of the second partner.
  • Keep_pedalling
    Keep_pedalling Posts: 22,502 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I thought the sort of trust you are talking about became obsolete for married couple when the transferable nil rate band came in.

    The usual reason for using tenants in common is to protect half the house from being gobbled up in care costs for the surviving spouse, but that is not really nessasary on a property of this high value, so why complicate things?

    Are there substantial liquid assets that would currently fall into the estate?
  • The usual reason for using tenants in common is to protect half the house from being gobbled up in care costs for the surviving spouse, but that is not really nessasary on a property of this high value, so why complicate things?

    Are there substantial liquid assets that would currently fall into the estate?

    This is not being considered for Care Home implications, but protecting my son should the wife remarry.

    There are other assets, pensions, ISA, cash, etc.

    Do you have another possible solution?
  • This is not being considered for Care Home implications, but protecting my son should the wife remarry.

    There are other assets, pensions, ISA, cash, etc.

    Do you have another possible solution?

    With an estate this size, and the slightly complex family setup, the only option is to to take good professional advice.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.