Wright Hassall LBC

slippery-beef

Please forgive me. I work hard, I'm tired most of the time and cannot get my head around this legal jargon..

I believe I have got a LBC from WH (I actually have 4 of them!)

It's different from others I have received, Instead of just single pieces of paper, I've been sent books. Has WH (ZZPS) re-written their letters to comply with the new PRE-ACTION CONDUCT AND PROTOCOLS?

Page 1 ibb.co/fE7O2w

Page 2 ibb.co/gLPmNw

for those who want to know: the car was parked for 8 months by the trader (Who I got the car from) while I was going through a small claims court claim because the trader refused to fix it. The trader shut his business and re-opened another to avoid paying
me.

I appreciate your patience!

System

the car was parked for 8 months by the trader (Who I got the car from) while I was going through a small claims court claim because the trader refused to fix it.

You clearly were not the driver or the keeper so you have an absolute defence. To nip this in the bud, you should advise WH of the same but you will need to back it up with some evidence such as paperwork from the court about your claim.

slippery-beef

All I have is the court letters, do you think that will be enough?

I do believe the car was parked before the NTC signs were erected aswell.

Umkomaas

Page 1. http://ibb.co/fE7O2w

Page 2. http://ibb.co/gLPmNw

I've been sent books.

Please elaborate.

slippery-beef

Page 3: ibb.co/idVHVG
Page 4: ibb.co/hq7WqG
Page 5: ibb.co/jNaUcw
Page 6: ibb.co/hC2Ljb
Page 7: ibb.co/dYzpcw
Page 8: ibb.co/e09uAG
Page 9: ibb.co/c4dAjb

And a Financial Statement at the end.

I haven't got a clue who addressed the letter..

beamerguy

slippery-beef wrote: »

Page 3: http://ibb.co/idVHVG
Page 4: http://ibb.co/hq7WqG
Page 5: http://ibb.co/jNaUcw
Page 6: http://ibb.co/hC2Ljb
Page 7: http://ibb.co/dYzpcw
Page 8: http://ibb.co/e09uAG
Page 9: http://ibb.co/c4dAjb

And a Financial Statement at the end.

I haven't got a clue who addressed the letter..

LIVE as above

Fancy that, WH has complied with the new protocol

There is no logic to Wright Hassall, they are simply working
on the cheap, they class themselves as real solicitors but
all the solicitors I know would not get out of bed for such
a poultry sum of money.
And the biggest clue is they might not win and you will win

All this effort for £90 odd pounds and a charge to the PPC.

A bit like a "pound store" in the legal profession

It is a sad day when the legal profession have to
scrape around for money

slippery-beef

There appears to be mistakes on their cover letter, there is two phone numbers and two e-mail address.

and only three out of the four are signed.

With the way its worded, are WH able to take me to court? Or is that still only possible by the Car Park Operator?

Ryandavis1959

WH will be representing the parking firm in court.

Just tell them the truth and based on what you have said you have a great defence. Just make sure you supply your evidence at this stage so that you are also complying with the rules.

Umkomaas

WH will be representing the parking firm in court.

Really? They won’t even get out of bed for 90 quid. Where do you get your ideas from?

The only court case in which they have been directly involved in is the nurses in South Wales (a huge case in comparison to this one).

There is no evidence that WH have been involved in any run-of-the-mill private parking cases at county court level. They seem to value their reputation.

@ Ryan - You really must stop giving advice that is not backed by hard facts or real experience.

beamerguy

slippery-beef wrote: »

There appears to be mistakes on their cover letter, there is two phone numbers and two e-mail address.

and only three out of the four are signed.

With the way its worded, are WH able to take me to court? Or is that still only possible by the Car Park Operator?

You seem to be a bit confused.

Wait until some of the trusted experienced members
on here reply to you

In the meantime, for your safety and security, ignore
any PM (private message) from anyone who has less
than 1000 posts to their name

[Deleted User]

I'd draft a robust response to that. Yes they have sent you a pretty information pack, but:

1. What are their allegations?
2. Have they supplied the parking contract /complete terms?
3. Have they supplied their parking contract to operate on site?

Ask for that and make clear in the letter that you have a complete defence to the claim and were neither the driver nor in possession of the vehicle. The claim is without merit and you invite them to discontinue.