We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Council Tax Exemption backpayment and ESA

2»

Comments

  • Mersey_2
    Mersey_2 Posts: 1,679 Forumite
    gray1404 wrote: »
    I am still really confused regarding this "data matching". What is it and when does it take place?



    It's nothing to be unduly worried about.


    Govt bodies and some large organisations such as insurers and banks can share data in order to detect and prevent fraud (from memory s29 of the Data Protection Act is the exception allowing the sharing of confidential personal data about individuals in such circumstances)


    However, in recent years - and to enable 'joined-up Govt' - the DWP, HMRC, Councils have begun routinely sharing more in order to match claims and spot errors, from looking at Electoral Rolls, passport data, births and deaths and so on. Data washing is sometimes used as the jargon by HMRC in their evidence to MPs.
    Please be polite to OPs and remember this is a site for Claimants and Appellants to seek redress against their bank, ex-boss or retailer. If they wanted morality or the view of the IoD or Bank they'd ask them.
  • CIS
    CIS Posts: 12,260 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    You are correct regarding it being s29 of the DPA which covers anti-fraud measures etc for data.

    The National Fraud Initiative goes on every couple of years for local authorities and similar bodies (public and private) to share data but in real terms data is constantly being matched between a lot of organisations to try and stamp out fraud - it's nothing to be worried about. You can pretty much guarantee any person who had claimed any sort of benefit or council tax reduction has already been data-matched at least once, assuming everything is OK you'd never even known it went on.
    I no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.
  • gray1404
    gray1404 Posts: 88 Forumite
    What sort of data do they match though? It really does sound like "big brother" when you read it. I was under the impression that your bank data was totally private and things like passport data seems a bit too far. So there are private companies (airlines and banks) passing on data to the DWP "just in case." What I mean is that the bank might not even know someone is claiming.
  • epitome
    epitome Posts: 3,199 Forumite
    edited 5 December 2017 at 11:06PM
    I don't have it to hand, but if I were you I would look up the guidance that says it should be disregarded, just to familiarise yourself with the legislation and reasons for disregard... for example it may only be disregarded if it is official error....so you should ask the council to confirm it is official error arrears.

    There is other guidance that states if the amount is £5,000 or more then it is not only disregarded for 1 year, but it is disregarded for the life of the current ESA claim.... but if the ESA claim closes then it could not be disregarded anymore.

    You need to look up capital that is disregarded
    and capital to be disregarded indefinately

    And confirm that council tax arrears are included in this.
  • Energize
    Energize Posts: 509 Forumite
    I've received tax rebates from hmrc before while on benefits and it didn't show up as income on the universal credit system.
  • Mersey_2
    Mersey_2 Posts: 1,679 Forumite
    That's good to hear Energise, as redress is not profit and so should never be considered as income.
    Please be polite to OPs and remember this is a site for Claimants and Appellants to seek redress against their bank, ex-boss or retailer. If they wanted morality or the view of the IoD or Bank they'd ask them.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.