EON Standard tariff but..

Raxiel

50Twuncle wrote: »

Hello Rubideum / Cameltoe/ Espresso etc good to have you back with yet another identity......

No, I'm Sparticus!

Seriously though, who?

House_Martin

Raxiel wrote: »

No, I'm Sparticus!

Seriously though, who?

This poster , Espresso/Cameltoe/Rubidium/ Thorganby and now highly likely Sosumi as well I believe have all been the very same poster who keeps cropping up making some unfriendly posts and has been for years.
He s even thanking himself with a different username IMO
This was quite an uncalled for comment intimating that the OP was "protecting his inheritance "in regards to trying to get his in laws simply to abandon expensive standard variable tariffs.

Raxiel

House_Martin wrote: »

This poster , Espresso, Cameltoe, Rubidium and now Thorganby and now highly likely Sosumi keep cropping up making unfreindly posts and has been for years.
He s even thanking himself with a different username IMO
This was quite an uncalled for comment intimating the OP was "protecting his inheritance "in regards to trying to get his in laws simply to abandon expensive standard variable tariffs

Ok, fair enough, but I'm not the one that made posts about inheritance. I'm the one who pointed out that E.ON have a few 'no exit fee tariffs' besides the SVT :think:

50Twuncle

M

Raxiel wrote: »

Ok, fair enough, but I'm not the one that made posts about inheritance. I'm the one who pointed out that E.ON have a few 'no exit fee tariffs' besides the SVT :think:

Sorry - my mistake - thats what using a tablet does !!
I will repost what I meant first time. .

50Twuncle

Sosumi wrote: »

Nice one, thorganby. :T

Hello Sosumi, Espresso, Rubideum, Cameltoe etc etc etc...
How / Who are you this fine day ?

trickytree1963

thorganby wrote: »

There is no "but" the problem is simply down to your in-laws paranoia and ignorance. You are expecting their supplier to protect your inheritance for you when like all businesses, they need to return a profit for their shareholders. Your in-laws have already been informed about various cheaper tariffs available to them without the need to change supplier but they obviously do not want to change from the standard variable tariff. The suppliers representative has fully explained the situation to you even though your in-laws content with their standard tariff.

Isnt that the problem though? Shareholders dividends etc. Sooner we take back these companies into public ownership the better :j

thorganby

House_Martin wrote: »

This poster , Espresso/Cameltoe/Rubidium/ Thorganby and now highly likely Sosumi as well I believe have all been the very same poster who keeps cropping up making some unfriendly posts and has been for years.
He s even thanking himself with a different username IMO
This was quite an uncalled for comment intimating that the OP was "protecting his inheritance "in regards to trying to get his in laws simply to abandon expensive standard variable tariffs.

I did not take this thread completely off topic, you and your sidekick have done that. You should apologise, lay off the childish mob rule tactics and stop posting your silly assumptions. Common decency and forum rules apply to you, so if you don't agree with another posters comments then simply ignore them and move on.


You must realise that repeatedly posing libellous comments about myself and other users is simply bad etiquette and you really should know better.


Only last week when you disagreed with one of my comments, you stated that you would ignore my future posts but you just had to chip in with your worthless remarks didn't you, which really is rather sad.

thorganby

trickytree1963 wrote: »

Isnt that the problem though? Shareholders dividends etc. Sooner we take back these companies into public ownership the better :j

That is not why this thread was started and I suggest that you start your own thread to discuss privatisation, as it is a totally separate topic unrelated to standard variable tariffs.