PCM & Gladstones want a revenge

NeilCr

Just watch out that, if you win, the costs aren't lumped into next year's service charges.

Sassii

Hi All

could please some one help reviewing the below particulars of claim which we are going to fill online so max. 1080 characters. residents are going to give MA a xmas Claim Form gifts pushing MA to kick off pcm from site.


The Claimant claims £750 for the damage and/or distress and indemnity cost if applicable in respect of breaches of the Data Protection Act 1998 (DPA) as:
Defendant’s contractor Parking Control Management (UK) Ltd (pcm) unlawfully asked for Claimant data from DVLA for alleged parking charge for incident on xxxxxxxxxx at xxxxxxx xxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxx, xxxxxxxx. Also pcm processed Claimant data to xxx and Gladstone’s Solicitors although Claimant served to pcm section 10 notice under the DPA.

Defendant liability as a Management Company has agreement with pcm is clearly established.

Defendant did not respond to Claimant’s requests to settle the issue which increasing the damage and/or distress to the Defendant for a year and half from xxxxxxxxxx to xxxxxxxxxx.

pcm legal proceeding v Claimant, claim number xxxxxxxx, was struck out on xxxxxxxxxx hearing at Romford county court as Claimant proved to court his right under contract T&C with the Landowner, pcm had no cause of action nor prospect of success and for pcm non compliance.

bargepole

Here it is in the proper legal format. 945 characters, but by the time you insert the dates it will be close to the limit:

Claim for damages arising from Defendant's breach of the Data Protection Act 1998. The Defendant, a property management company, contracted with a third party private parking operator (PCM UK) on [DATE]. On the following dates [DATES], their contractor unlawfully obtained the Claimant's personal data from the DVLA, unlawfully processed that data, and unlawfully shared that data with a third party (Gladstones Soloicitors). The contractor's claim against the Claimant, no. [CLAIM NO] was dismissed res judicata at Romford County Court on [DATE], where it was held that the contractor had no cause of action due to the primacy of contract of the Lease. The Claimant has made complaints to the Defendant for some 18 months regarding this issue, with no resolution. Consequent upon the breach, the Claimant has suffered loss and damage, for which the Defendant is held to be vicariously liable.. And the Claimant claims a) £750 in damages; b) Costs.

Sassii

bargepole wrote: »

Here it is in the proper legal format. 945 characters, but by the time you insert the dates it will be close to the limit:

Thanks v much

Coupon-mad

Can't get better than that advice! Power to your elbow, Sassii, hope this works and PCM are kicked out.

Sassii

Hi All

Received a reply to my LBC from MA solicitor saying '' My Client does not believe a breach of the data protection rules requiring a payment of compensation has occurred. I am advised by my client that pcm UK actions are in my client's legitimate interest to enforce parking fines at xxxx''

fisherjim

Sassii wrote: »

Hi All

Received a reply to my LBC from MA solicitor saying '' My Client does not believe a breach of the data protection rules requiring a payment of compensation has occurred. I am advised by my client that pcm UK actions are in my client's legitimate interest to enforce parking fines at xxxx''

I doubt "their client" knows what they are talking about and neither does the solicitor if they actually said "to enforce parking fines"!

Umkomaas

On the nail fj! Well spotted.

Sassii

fisherjim wrote: »

I doubt "their client" knows what they are talking about and neither does the solicitor if they actually said "to enforce parking fines"!

you are right. Claim form already issued before receiving that reply as MA replied 20 days from LBC.

Coupon-mad

Nice one, keep us updated.