We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Right of access over drive.

2»

Comments

  • rosyw
    rosyw Posts: 519 Forumite
    PPI Party Pooper
    I think you're right to stick to your guns! Informal agreements are all well and good, until someone abuses them When I bought my place I soon discovered that my neighbour was in the habit of using my drive as a turning point, due to the layout it made it easier for him to revers into his drive, which is at right angles to mine, he also too liberties with regard to parking on my drive if they had a few friends over. Had he asked I probably wouldn't have minded, but he didn't & he wasn't the friendliest of people, so when he was at work one day I had a large pair of gates put up, that stopped him!! Not a single word was said about it :rotfl:
  • Some council tenants own cars. Get over it.
    Think the original post was sarcasm. Maybe it was too smart foryou ;)
  • That's exactly my issue, they drive, park and block it when it suits them, we have cctv so I see exactly what they get up to when I I'm not in - Including driving over the bit we already own at the front. Hubbie had suggested lets just have block paving stones sunk in a line where the boundary is but that won't stop them abusing it and I'll just end up getting more wound up. I'm hoping the council will side with us and I'll get permission for the fence to the road. I already have a contractor on standby and I roughly know the neighbours shift pattern for work! 😂
  • Ozzuk
    Ozzuk Posts: 1,884 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    Your post makes sense now. If they aren't modified their behaviour to allow you to park on your own land then its down to you to remedy. I'd stick the fence up, perhaps leaving the last panel out as a compromise, you can always add it later.
  • pimento
    pimento Posts: 6,243 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts
    Cakeguts wrote: »
    Why have the council let a property to tenants who can afford to run a car? Aren't there people in your area who are more deserving of a council property? People who can't afford a car? It seems most unfair that poor council tenants are subsidising these tenants with cheap rents so that they can have a car.

    Quite right. Tell your next door neighbours to get rid of their Rolls Royce and buy a bicycle. They'll be able to get that on and off without a problem.

    :p
    "If you think it's expensive to hire a professional to do the job, wait until you hire an amateur." -- Red Adair
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    When I was growing up, very few council tenants could afford bicycles. We used to laugh at them and call them the 'Cycle Toffs'.

    The rest of us had to use shanks pony, but that was a nightmare when you had a hole in your shoe. Assuming you could afford shoes....
  • hazyjo
    hazyjo Posts: 15,475 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I would be doing everything to lose the 'shared' tag now that you know it was never actually meant to be shared. I would never touch a house with a shared drive, and it would put many others off too. The longer you allow them to cross the boundary/use as shared space, the more likely they are to claim rights over it in the future. I would be marking the boundary very clearly (wall/fence/chain, whatever). If it means they have to park on the street or elsewhere, so be it.


    Not a case of being awkward, I'm usually a very accommodating person, but you have to think of resale.
    2024 wins: *must start comping again!*
  • PasturesNew
    PasturesNew Posts: 70,698 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    No. They have no rights. You're lucky to have the Council sorting this out so everybody's clear.

    Nobody minds helping out, but many bullies will just "take advantage" and get aggressive and territorial over rights they don't have at all. They will get 4rsey with you when it's THEM in the wrong.

    Don't let them bully you into doing something you don't wish to do.

    It is THEIR problem, it is not yours. Do not allow them to make THEIR problem your problem.

    Nobody minds a little give and take, but when it's being taken with menaces and spite then they can p155 off.

    Everybody wants to be a good neighbour, but you can't let people ride rough shod over you and your rights to the land that you lawfully own.

    I'd find a way to landscape the front in such a way that they can no longer continue to take the p155.
  • The council visited the neighbour yesterday (I met with them last week and put my case across) still no update for me so I assume the housing manager is needing to speak to her boss etc etc. The nice legal services lady who I've been dealing with since day 1 is very nice and appears to be in agreement with us. Whilst it's a council house the tenant still has rights so they are needing his co-operation and agreement. Hoping it won't drag on much longer - this all started in January!
  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    Whilst it's a council house the tenant still has rights so they are needing his co-operation and agreement.
    Without shared access the tenants rights end at your boundary. Hopefully the council are tactfully explaining this to the tenant and trying to provide a solution to access their property. While its good to be agreeable, don't feel obliged to agree to anything you are not entirely happy with.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.