PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buying house with restrictive covenant "a single dwelling house"

2»

Comments

  • loveka
    loveka Posts: 535 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Davesnave wrote: »
    Pedant alert: "house's" isn't plural. It means "belonging to the house."


    Sorry, that is autocorrect! It says house.
  • ProDave
    ProDave Posts: 3,785 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    loveka wrote: »
    Sorry, that is autocorrect! It says house.

    The intention of the covenant was probably to prevent you developing the site by building another house or converting a barn, or more likely giving you permission to do so upon a payment for the uplift in value.

    It comes back to it looking like there is nobody to actually enforce the covenant but in any event the indemnity policy should cover any existing breach.
  • davidmcn
    davidmcn Posts: 23,596 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It reads to me more as a restriction to residential use - if it was to prohibit subdivision then it would (I think) have to specifically say so, not just be implied by the fact they used the singular.
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    davidmcn wrote: »
    It reads to me more as a restriction to residential use - if it was to prohibit subdivision then it would (I think) have to specifically say so, not just be implied by the fact they used the singular.
    and yet there is a barn on the property which, being unconverted, suggests farm use........

    It would help if the OP provided the full wording of the covenant including context, rather than just selected limited extracts.
  • lincroft1710
    lincroft1710 Posts: 18,947 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    G_M wrote: »
    and yet there is a barn on the property which, being unconverted, suggests farm use........

    In some parts of the UK, the word "barn" is used for a general storage building, rather than exclusively for an agricultural or ex-agricultural building. I have even heard small coal stores, referred to as "coal barns".
    If you are querying your Council Tax band would you please state whether you are in England, Scotland or Wales
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.