We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
What happens if the management company goes bankrupt?
Comments
-
Sounds like there are a few options - but they all mean the directors doing their job which might be a problem.
Getting the delinquent landlord to pay his dues - maybe by legal action.
Increase the service charge to cover those owners that don't pay the service charge.
Request a lump sum from flat owners to maintain a contingency balance.
Reduce the costs e.g. don't carry out maintenance.
It sounds like those all might be needed.
At the moment there doesn't seem to be any financial reason for this landlord to pay.
You could sell the company but would probably end up paying more per flat and still end up covering the costs of this landlord.0 -
That might not be possible - most leases state that "a certain proportion of " and then what can qualify. By increasing the service charge to cover a missing (or unpaid) proportion requires each paying leaseholder to pay more than their lease permits and of course that is in breech of the terms of the lease.
This happened to Sun Court (Worthing) Management Co Ltd when the chairman who was also a leaseholder reduced his apportionment leaving an overall shortfall. Legal action was taken against the company by another leaseholder to recover the overpayment that had been charged. At one point the directors stated that the company was heading for insolvency. I think this could possibly still happen because of the action the directors took in trying to resolve the issue but I am not sure.
In a similar manner reducing the maintenance might not help as this will also reduce the amount that can be recovered from the leaseholders.
Also remember that any reserve fund is held in trust for the benefit of the leaseholders - and thus would not be lost should the company go into administration.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards