We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Maximum to hold in a single fund/IT

Options
Robie
Robie Posts: 150 Forumite
Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
edited 26 October 2017 at 4:16AM in Savings & investments
Hi

Simple questions, I hope.

What's the maximum I should hold/invest in a single fund/IT? This is terms of money not percentage of a portfolio. This is in line with money safety.

Also, if I am investing in say two funds/ITs with the same company (I will use Vanguard as an example but it could be any) will it (sort of) halve the amount of money I invest in each fund so that the total is a maximum I should invest?

Thanks.
Robie

Comments

  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,153 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Safety from what? If you are talking about risks covered by the FSCS then what is covered is straightforward. ITs are not covered at all. UTs/Oeics are covered at the fund manager company level to £50K, no matter how many funds you hold from that company.

    Whether that should affect how you invest is up to you. For my investing it is irrelevant as I don’t see the risks as being of any significance whatsoever if one confines oneself to mainstream regulated companies.
  • Robie
    Robie Posts: 150 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    Linton wrote: »
    Safety from what? If you are talking about risks covered by the FSCS then what is covered is straightforward. ITs are not covered at all. UTs/Oeics are covered at the fund manager company level to £50K, no matter how many funds you hold from that company.

    Whether that should affect how you invest is up to you. For my investing it is irrelevant as I don’t see the risks as being of any significance whatsoever if one confines oneself to mainstream regulated companies.

    Thank you Linton, that makes sense now.
  • Audaxer
    Audaxer Posts: 3,547 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Linton wrote: »
    For my investing it is irrelevant as I don’t see the risks as being of any significance whatsoever if one confines oneself to mainstream regulated companies.
    I certainly hope that would be the case, but I have a nagging doubt that even with a large mainstream regulated company, there is a possibility something could happen like a major fraud that could affect your investment. So I'm a bit reluctant to put more than £50k in one fund house.
  • bigadaj
    bigadaj Posts: 11,531 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Audaxer wrote: »
    I certainly hope that would be the case, but I have a nagging doubt that even with a large mainstream regulated company, there is a possibility something could happen like a major fraud that could affect your investment. So I'm a bit reluctant to put more than £50k in one fund house.


    Hopefully that will change over time as the indication is that £50k is a significant portion of your investable wealth. Once you get to high six or seven figures then depending on your investing strategy it may be much easier to hold in excess of £50k in one or more funds, or indeed fund houses.
  • Linton
    Linton Posts: 18,153 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Hung up my suit!
    Audaxer wrote: »
    I certainly hope that would be the case, but I have a nagging doubt that even with a large mainstream regulated company, there is a possibility something could happen like a major fraud that could affect your investment. So I'm a bit reluctant to put more than £50k in one fund house.

    Dont forget that FSCS protection would only apply if the fund management company was unable to cover the losses. So we arent talking about a rogue employee pinching the odd cheque. To bring down a major fund management company (Vanguard and Blackrock manage $Trillions and employ many 1000's of staff) it surely would need to be something systemic infecting the whole organisation. The !!!!! (sorry MSE I must spell it M a f i a) running a major fund management company may be a plot for a John Grisham novel but.....

    However I suppose the key point is that each investor must feel comfortable with their investments. If you arent comfortable unless you have less than £50K with any particular fund manager then that's what you must do. Though were one to be investing £500K it could be a little restrictive.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.