📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Budget: Hammond mulling tax cuts for young paid for by slashing pension tax reliefs

«1345678

Comments

  • JoeCrystal
    JoeCrystal Posts: 3,335 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Interesting! Speaking as someone who is his thirties, I look forward just how this year budget benefit me personally. (Clue is not at all. A single childless healthy taxpayer is always the one to be shafted, no matter the age.)

    Maybe we will get better tax relief on pension contribution, that would be nice and may encourage more to save earlier in the twenties and thirties.
  • atush
    atush Posts: 18,731 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Will he still be in the job come the budget?
  • BLB53
    BLB53 Posts: 1,583 Forumite
    Will he still be in the job come the budget?
    I really hope not...needs to be replaced asap.
  • Lorian
    Lorian Posts: 6,273 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Would he risk loosing two older votes for every new one?
  • Pennywise
    Pennywise Posts: 13,468 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    BLB53 wrote: »
    I really hope not...needs to be replaced asap.

    Why do we always get hopeless chancellors? You can go back decades and it's just one after another who havn't a clue. The only half decent one in the last 30 years was Alistair Darling, which is saying something as I'm a Tory, but he was the only one who seemed to take his job seriously and do some proper thinking/analysis about the consequences of his proposals.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    All sorts of radical ideas get floated in the newspapers before a Budget so that when the real thing comes, everyone breathes a sigh of relief when it turns out to be the usual boring deckchair-rearranging.

    The Torygraph has already skipped ahead to the bit where the whole thing is oversimplified and misleadingly described as an "X" tax (pasty tax, dementia tax, bedroom tax), with this Budget being described as a "tax on age". We don't even know what will be in it yet, but who cares, it's a "tax on age".

    It's like the Chinese Zodiac, the next Budget will be dubbed the "tax on women" and the one after the "tax on dragons" and after twelve Budgets we go round again.
  • Malthusian
    Malthusian Posts: 11,055 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Pennywise wrote: »
    The only half decent one in the last 30 years was Alistair Darling, which is saying something as I'm a Tory, but he was the only one who seemed to take his job seriously and do some proper thinking/analysis about the consequences of his proposals.

    The genius behind the 50% tax band that resulted in less tax being collected from higher earners, as everyone who was half-awake during A-Level Economics predicted would happen?

    Either he wasn't properly thinking about that proposal or he simply didn't care about making the Treasury and the country poorer in order to pander to the smash-the-rich hard left.
  • westv
    westv Posts: 6,461 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I'm surprised the old chestnut "25% tax free lump sum under threat" hasn't reared it's head yet.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,814 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    The month before a budget sees all the think tanks come out trying to suggest various things that could be done. Usually presented by the media as something the Govt is considering. Sometimes a think tank me be on the same wavelength. Just as a broken click is right twice a day.

    More often than not, they are very far from the truth.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Pennywise
    Pennywise Posts: 13,468 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Malthusian wrote: »
    The genius behind the 50% tax band that resulted in less tax being collected from higher earners, as everyone who was half-awake during A-Level Economics predicted would happen?

    Either he wasn't properly thinking about that proposal or he simply didn't care about making the Treasury and the country poorer in order to pander to the smash-the-rich hard left.

    Not as bad as child benefit removal for earners over £50k or personal allowance removal for earners over £100k. Now they really were stupid changes that have done far more harm as the numbers of people affected are massively higher than the very few earners over £150k. In particular the £100k threshold for loss of personal allowance has directly resulted in fewer doctors and dentists working full time as they now tend to work fewer hours to keep their income below £100k and avoid the punitive 62% tax/nic marginal rate!
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.