We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Under valued help to buy mortgage valuation, what to do?
Comments
-
Crashy_Time wrote: »
London property is performing so well for me Crashy that I have already revised my retirement portfolio, and decided to hold onto most of my property for another 4-6 years (market dependant):
61% shares (excl VCT)
25% fixed pension (DB and state, might be able to get up to 25%)
5% investment property
4% cash (regular savers/NSI cert/some savings acc)
3% P2P (possibly)
2% VCT (possibly)
But due to the lack of alternative comparable investments (namely bonds), I am also considering holding onto my highest yielding property for a further 10 years (until my mid 70's):
45% shares (excl VCT, approx 13% REIT incl)
25% fixed pension (DB and state, might be able to get up to 25%)
20% investment property
4% cash (regular savers/NSI cert/some savings acc)
4% P2P (possibly)
2% VCT (possibly)Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris wrote: »London property is performing so well for me Crashy that I have already revised my retirement portfolio, and decided to hold onto most of my property for another 4-6 years (market dependant):
61% shares (excl VCT)
25% fixed pension (DB and state, might be able to get up to 25%)
5% investment property
4% cash (regular savers/NSI cert/some savings acc)
3% P2P (possibly)
2% VCT (possibly)
But due to the lack of alternative comparable investments (namely bonds), I am also considering holding onto my highest yielding property for a further 10 years (until my mid 70's):
50% shares (excl VCT, approx 13% REIT incl)
25% fixed pension (DB and state, might be able to get up to 25%)
16% investment property
4% cash (regular savers/NSI cert/some savings acc)
3% P2P (possibly)
2% VCT (possibly)
How is it performing for other people, more recent buyers for example?0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »How is it performing for other people, more recent buyers for example?
Property is a long term investment, you can't (shouldn't) judge it over short term periods. Although I accept if it is falling it is tempting to wait it out, but I mostly bought mine when they were still falling in the early 90's, because I was happy with the price paid. You can only see the bottom of the market after it has already been reached. How long have you been waiting for the bottom of the market? Is it coming up to about 20 years? How much have they risen since then?Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
chucknorris wrote: »Property is a long term investment, you can't (shouldn't) judge it over short term periods. Although I accept if it is falling it is tempting to wait it out, but I mostly bought mine when they were still falling in the early 90's, because I was happy with the price paid. You can only see the bottom of the market after it has already been reached. How long have you been waiting for the bottom of the market? Is it coming up to about 20 years? How much have they risen since then?
I wasn`t remotely interested in house prices 20 years ago, not many people were actually, but the question was why do you think someone who bought last year should take anything from your situation?0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »I wasn`t remotely interested in house prices 20 years ago..
This goes some way to explaining why you sold up in 1997 and have been living in a rented bedsit since then, missing out on a 20 year bull run in house prices
There is a lesson there in an amateur trying to second guess the market.
Buy when the time is right for you, don't base your decisions on the internet wisdom of a 50+ year old man living in a rented bedsit.0 -
-
Crashy_Time wrote: »
Moneyweek???
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
That comic has been predicting a house price crash since the early 2000's.
Even the editor, MSW, doesn't follow its own advice - having moved from rental in to home ownership in late 2009. Shame you didn't do the same Crashy!!
:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »I wasn`t remotely interested in house prices 20 years ago, not many people were actually, but the question was why do you think someone who bought last year should take anything from your situation?
But isn't that approximately when you sold to rent? If so, you must have been extremely interested in house prices. Well I'm sure that people were just as interested in house prices back then as they are now.
Someone that bought last year needs to know (although most already will of course) that short term fluctuation in house prices aren't as relevant as how they fluctuate over 25 years and beyond. It is more important to be happy with the price paid and where you end up living, than trying to time the market, you only have to look at your attempts to time the market, to see that.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »
Good news for us Crashy, we are looking to upsize, I hope it impacts on Surrey houses. I see it as opportunity, if it scares away any of our would be competitors when buying our next home.Chuck Norris can kill two stones with one birdThe only time Chuck Norris was wrong was when he thought he had made a mistakeChuck Norris puts the "laughter" in "manslaughter".I've started running again, after several injuries had forced me to stop0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards