We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Peppercorn 999yrs
Eee21
Posts: 7 Forumite
Hello all I am new to all this and this site so if anything sounds silly I apologise.
I own a downstairs shop and it has a flat above which I do not own but am looking at purchasing. The landlord for the flat also owns the freehold to my shop, so I am leasehold on the shop even though I have bought the shop outright a while ago. The shop has a peppercorn rent from 1990 for term 999yrs. If I were to buy the flat above I would then own the freehold on the whole thing. I am wanting to purchase the flat as a long term investment to rent out and was wondering if there is any issue I need to be aware of that could bite me in the butt or am I good to go. I am intending to purchase the flat cash without a mortgage. Thank you in advance.
I own a downstairs shop and it has a flat above which I do not own but am looking at purchasing. The landlord for the flat also owns the freehold to my shop, so I am leasehold on the shop even though I have bought the shop outright a while ago. The shop has a peppercorn rent from 1990 for term 999yrs. If I were to buy the flat above I would then own the freehold on the whole thing. I am wanting to purchase the flat as a long term investment to rent out and was wondering if there is any issue I need to be aware of that could bite me in the butt or am I good to go. I am intending to purchase the flat cash without a mortgage. Thank you in advance.
0
Comments
-
You have to buy the freehold not just the flat. The flat will be leasehold.0
-
if you buy the freehold then you will need to check the rules about SDLT and "mixed use" properties since your freehold comprises both a commercial shop and a residential flatHello all I am new to all this and this site so if anything sounds silly I apologise.
OK, but you need to learn when to use certain technical words correctly
I own a downstairs shop and it has a flat above which I do not own but am looking at purchasing. The landlord for the flat also owns the freehold to my shop, so I am leasehold on the shop even though I have bought the shop outright a while ago. The shop has a peppercorn rent from 1990 for term 999yrs. no, "outright" usually implies you purchased the freehold, since that is the only way to own something "outright". You have not, you have purchased a lease, albeit one on the "ideal" 999 year term, you have not purchased the freehold If I were to buy the flat above I would then own the freehold on the whole thing. I am wanting to purchase the flat as a long term investment to rent out and was wondering if there is any issue I need to be aware of that could bite me in the butt or am I good to go. I am intending to purchase the flat cash without a mortgage. Thank you in advance.0 -
The person I would by the flat off has said I would then get the freehold to both if purchased.0
-
That's fine then. But the point is you have to buy both the lease to the flat AND the freehold. These are seperate purchases , but povided he's selling bboth, you're fine. as for the letting business:The person I would by the flat off has said I would then get the freehold to both if purchased.
** Tenancies in Eng/Wales: Guides for landlords and tenants This thread is intended to provide information to both landlords and tenants relating to Assured Shorthold Tenancies (ASTs) in England and Wales.
Topics covered:
* Repairing Obligations: the law, common misconceptions, reporting/enforcing, retaliatory eviction & the new tenant protection (2015)
* Deposits: payment, protection and return
* Ending/renewing an AST: what happens when a fixed term ends? How can a LL or tenant end a tenancy? What is a periodic tenancy?
* Rent increases: when & how can rent be increased?
* Repossession: what if a LL's mortgage lender repossesses the property?
* New landlords: advice, information & links
* Letting agents: how should a landlord select or sack?0 -
Iv been informed that I would have the leasehold and the freehold for the shop but the flat is only freehold there is no leasehold for it.0
-
-
Is it possible to get a leasehold attached to it ?0
-
????Is it possible to get a leasehold attached to it ?
* There is a freehlod to the building, owned by Mr X
* there is a flat which is probably leasehold, also owned by Mr X
* It is possible the flat is not leasehold - it may be included within the freehold to the building(edit - I see you've said this is the case here)
* There is a lease to the shop (peppercorn) owned by you
* you wish to buy the flat. You also wish to own the freehold. So
a) if the flat is leasehold, you need to buy the lease and the freehold
b) if the flat is not leasehold, you need to buy the freehold
* if b) happens, you could not " get a leasehold attached to it" as that would mean granting yourself a lease. A lease can only be granted by one person to a different person.
* why would you want/need a lease on the flat, given you will own both units and the freehold?
* As mentioned previously, SDLT may be an issue.
* what has your solicitor said when you asked?
* Other issues relate to tenancy law - see my earler links0 -
so you will end up owning:Is it possible to get a leasehold attached to it ?
a) the freehold of the entire building which comprises a flat and a shop
b) a lease for the shop. That lease is then meaningless since you own the freehold of the building anyway so, as mentioned above, you "cannot" lease something to yourself.
In respect of the flat, you can get a solicitor to create a lease for the flat, and that would then enable you to sell the lease for the flat to a buyer. Creating a lease is something you really should pay for professional legal advice to do.
on the other hand if you merely want to let the flat ("rent it out") then you do not need to create a lease as you own the freehold of the flat and are therefore able to let the property to whoever you wish0 -
When you rent out the flat do you not have to give the tenant the lease hold to the flat ? My main concern is if I were to sell down the line and someone wants to borrow to buy it, a lease hold flat would be easier to get a mortgage on than a freehold flat, so I don't want its value to be effected.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards