We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Agent and Landlord trying to force new tenancy contract - what if we refuse to sign?
hounslowfish
Posts: 46 Forumite
We are reaching the end of our 12 month AST tenancy, and we wish to move to a periodic tenancy to give us the flexibility to buy a house.
The landlord and agent are refusing to agree to this, and want to try to force us to sign a new 12 month contract. We are very unhappy about that, as it scuppers our house-buying plans.
We know that there is nothing the landlord can do to stop a periodic tenancy coming into force automatically, if we simply remain in the property and refuse to sign this contract. We also know that the landlord can serve us with a section 21 notice, giving us 2 months notice to leave.
We don't think the landlord would do this (their concern about the periodic tenancy is that they don't want us to move out!), but nevertheless it feels like playing Chicken, and we hate the feeling of uncertainty and the breakdown in relations with the landlord.
I am wondering if anyone here has been in a similar situation and can give advice. What does it feel like to have a 21 notice served on you, and what happens if we refuse to move out?
And can anyone explain why a landlord would behave like this to good tenants who look after the property and pay above-market rent?! :-(
The landlord and agent are refusing to agree to this, and want to try to force us to sign a new 12 month contract. We are very unhappy about that, as it scuppers our house-buying plans.
We know that there is nothing the landlord can do to stop a periodic tenancy coming into force automatically, if we simply remain in the property and refuse to sign this contract. We also know that the landlord can serve us with a section 21 notice, giving us 2 months notice to leave.
We don't think the landlord would do this (their concern about the periodic tenancy is that they don't want us to move out!), but nevertheless it feels like playing Chicken, and we hate the feeling of uncertainty and the breakdown in relations with the landlord.
I am wondering if anyone here has been in a similar situation and can give advice. What does it feel like to have a 21 notice served on you, and what happens if we refuse to move out?
And can anyone explain why a landlord would behave like this to good tenants who look after the property and pay above-market rent?! :-(
0
Comments
-
Don't sign it; the landlord is very, very unlikely to issue a section 21 for this reason.
Say that you're sorry they feel that way, and if they feel the need to lose a reliable tenant, then so be it.0 -
Well done on knowing your stuff, few clarifications below.hounslowfish wrote: »We also know that the landlord can serve us with a section 21 notice, giving us 2 months notice to leave. - not quite, its 2 months notice of intention to apply for a possession order. (a) they might not follow through on their intention, and (b) after the two months you don't have to leave, thats the date the LL can apply to the court for a possession order, which itself will take more time.
We don't think the landlord would do this (their concern about the periodic tenancy is that they don't want us to move out!), but nevertheless it feels like playing Chicken, and we hate the feeling of uncertainty and the breakdown in relations with the landlord.- You can try to explain to the LL that you'll still give notice on a periodic and the eviction doesn't make sense, the agents are just after additional renewal fees.
I am wondering if anyone here has been in a similar situation and can give advice. What does it feel like to have a 21 notice served on you, and what happens if we refuse to move out?- I haven't been there so don't know what it feels like, but after the Section 21 notice expires
1. LL can apply to court for a possession order.
2. If the Section 21 notice is valid (it may not be) the court grants a possession order giving some time before the possession date.
3. After the possession date passes, the LL can apply for a bailiff warrant.
4. The bailiffs attend and you actually HAVE to leave.
And can anyone explain why a landlord would behave like this to good tenants who look after the property and pay above-market rent?! :-(- In some rental markets a particular renewal date might work better e.g. to keep in line with academic years for the student market. Some areas might be difficult to rerent in the winter (supposedly..). Otherwise this is likely driven by the agent and the renewal fees they receive. The LL often blindly follows the LA or is convinced by their arguments for preferring renewal.0 -
hounslowfish wrote: »And can anyone explain why a landlord would behave like this to good tenants who look after the property and pay above-market rent?! :-(
Some BTL mortgage and insurance policies require the LL to have fixed-term contracts, but most of the time it's the agent pushing for the renewal as they can then charge both you and the landlord for the privilege. Also the agents aren't worried about a void, as it means they can charge even more fees to the landlord and new tenant.
Have you actually spoken to the LL about this, or has all communication been through the agents?0 -
Yes I have been in this situation and I contacted the LL directly in writing, explaining that we would both avoid the renewal fee but remain on mutually agreeable terms, so why bother? He agreed and the agents shut up.
Don't take the agent's word that the LL wants this, check directly yourself.They are an EYESORES!!!!0 -
Just to add I had it the other way round (me being the LL), I found out from a neighbour that the tenants were being pushed for renewal that they didn't want, having been told that I was insisting on it from the LA. I contacted them directly and we agreed there was no need to renew. I would have lost a perfectly good tenant due to the LA (who were soon released from their contract).
You have to remember for the LA the best outcome is for the tenant to leave. They then can charge their re-let fee, and all the "admin" fees they take from the new tenant. They already have all the marketing from the last time so it's easy money. The second best outcome is a renewal fee from both the tenant and the LL. Worst possible outcome is a periodic tenancy.0 -
I just wanted to second the advice (or third the advice!) to make sure you are getting this from the landlord, and not from the letting agent speaking for the landlord.
The landlord may not be as insistent on getting you to re-sign, it's more likely it is the LA insisting on it.0 -
A couple of years ago we were in a similar situation. Must sign or LL will serve notice.
We also wanted to buy, like you, and would not commit to a new tenancy. The LA offered us, and I'm not kidding, a new 12 month contract with a one month notice period for us.
It was immediately obvious what they were up to.The above facts belong to everybody; the opinions belong to me; the distinction is yours to draw...0 -
Out,_Vile_Jelly wrote: »Yes I have been in this situation and I contacted the LL directly in writing, explaining that we would both avoid the renewal fee but remain on mutually agreeable terms, so why bother? He agreed and the agents shut up.
Don't take the agent's word that the LL wants this, check directly yourself.
this 100%
I was in exactly the same situation as the OP when I was first looking to buy
Typed up, and send a letter and emailed it to both landlord and agent along the lines of what you said, and LL agreed it was by far the best outcome.0 -
Herewith links showing 40+ week time to evict, on average...
https://forums.landlordzone.co.uk/forum/residential-letting-questions/77351-time-to-repossess-statistics0 -
See
* Ending/renewing an AST: what happens when a fixed term ends? How can a LL or tenant end a tenancy? What is a periodic tenancy?
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.5K Spending & Discounts
- 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.6K Life & Family
- 261.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards