Gladstones

Lioness786

Also, can I use the same letter in the event that I will get another letter / LBC from Gladstones with reference to another PCN, but which I appealed to the IAS (I did not know about this forum back then and literally wrote what happened and why we parked there in the appeal letter), lost and stupidly named the Driver in the process!

Redx

just use the new rebuttal letters

the old ones are now as dead as a dodo

Lioness786

Thank you :-)

Lioness786

Hi all,


So I sent the most recent updated letter as discussed above to Gladstones in response to their recent letter once again chasing for payment..


This morning I have a letter back from them saying they cannot comply with section 10 of the data protection act 1998 to stop processing personal data as they are acting on their clients behalf and processing of my data is a necessary part of the contract, and that pursuant to section 10(2)(a), para 2, schedule 2, the processing of data s exempt from such a request. And regardless of if I think this is not the case, basically they do!


I am guessing I Should continue to ignore until we get LBC?

Redx

correct , or until you get an MCOL and if you do ensure it meets the new protocols

Lioness786

Thank you :-)

dee7479551

I had a letter from Gladstones where the reference started with a 3 and I did ignore it but now have a county court claim form.

Redx

dee7479551 wrote: »

I had a letter from Gladstones where the reference started with a 3 and I did ignore it but now have a county court claim form.

that was not from gladrags , it was from DRP on a gladrags pimped out letterhead

if you have an MCOL, start a new thread and read post #2 of the NEWBIES sticky thread

do the AOS online and start drafting your own defence