We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Ford money
Comments
-
100% correct/
Anyone disputing this is simply a "got to get the last word" freak :rotfl:
We appear to have a little too much time on our hands by the look of things.
The backing of a major multi national is of course an added benefit.
No one would have given much thought to the fscs protection prior to the gfc, so whilst the fscs protection is a primary concern then additional financial clout is useful.0 -
The backing of a major multi national is of course an added benefit.
But of minimal value - big multinationals can divest themselves of subsidiaries or just shut them down within days or weeks once their boards have decided to make a change. My guess is that Ford are trying to emulate GM which has tried to follow GE (General Electric) in evolving from a manufacturing company to a finance company. In any case, with a cloud hanging over the future of car leasing to retail customers, I wouldn't rely upon Ford being around in the long term. FSCS is really the only guarantee. (Disclosure: I've invested in the Ford regular saver.)0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards