We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Bombardier blow

Ballard
Posts: 2,983 Forumite

This really doesn’t look good for Northern Ireland in particular and the UK as a whole. There is so much hope of post-Brexit trade deals between us and the States so we will have to hope that this is a one off.
Bombardier describes tariff ruling in Boeing row as 'absurd'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-41397181
Bombardier describes tariff ruling in Boeing row as 'absurd'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-41397181
0
Comments
-
From what I understand, the tariff is a response to subsidies provided by the Canadian and UK governments to Bombardier, which Boeing claim create an unfair competitive advantage.
I'm pretty sure such subsidies would be prohibited under any trade deal.0 -
220% punitive Tariffs on any Bombardier aircraft sold into the USA - which means if this ruling stands there will be no Bombardier aircraft sold into the USA.
And all because the UK and Canadian governments offered preferential investment funding to attract manufacturing jobs.
This is a great example of why increasing international trade with countries like the USA will not be anywhere near as simple as some make out.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
Lets not forget the EU imposes considerable tariffs on all manner of global products, which has a knock-on effect for the competitiveness of UK output.
Lets also remember the many downsides of EU membership when it comes to for example our wishing to commission UK ship builders for our military needs.
I knew someone would draw some sort of simplistic conclusion that concludes all things non EU spell danger.0 -
Lets also remember the many downsides of EU membership when it comes to for example our wishing to commission UK ship builders for our military needs.
That would be a poor example as the UK Government, or any EU Government for that matter, can do as it wishes for military needs. Whether it chooses to or not for financial or political reasons is nothing much to do with the EU.0 -
It's not related to brexit, but it certainly shows trump isn't going to do us any favours over this special relationship. This could be a disaster.“What means that trump?” Timon of Athens by William Shakespeare0
-
qwert_yuiop wrote: »It's not related to brexit, but it certainly shows trump isn't going to do us any favours over this special relationship.
It's a judicial process through the US courts. What kind of favours do you want from Trump?0 -
Eric_the_half_a_bee wrote: »What kind of favours do you want from Trump?0
-
In the EU such actions could be countered with appropriate retaliation or even the threat of retaliation - it cant be difficult to find some due cause.
After BREXIT would the UK have the clout?0 -
Eric_the_half_a_bee wrote: »It's a judicial process through the US courts.
No, it's a US Dept. of Commerce decision.
The current US Secretary of State for Commerce is Wilbur Ross.
This Wilbur Ross:
https://www.cnbc.com/2016/12/27/brexit-is-a-god-given-opportunity-to-steal-trade-from-uk-wilbur-ross.html
Brexit is a ‘God-given opportunity’ to steal trade from UKDon't blame me, I voted Remain.0 -
mayonnaise wrote: »No, it's a US Dept. of Commerce decision.
The Commerce Department’s penalty against Bombardier will only take effect if the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) rules in Boeing’s favor in a final decision expected in 2018.
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-boeing-bombardier/u-s-slaps-steep-duties-on-bombardier-jets-after-boeing-complaint-idUSKCN1C138W
It's a judicial process0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards