We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Do investment fund service charges necessarily attract capital gains tax?

My so-called ethical investment fund has written to all members saying they will be introducing an annual service charge in addition to the present annual management charge. I understand that this is common but there are two mystifying aspects:

1.We are told to contact HMRC about the capital gains tax implications since the bank will be taking the service charge from the fund and this will be a capital gain. This sounds unnecessarily complicated, and contrary to the whole idea of stocks and shares ISAs which are supposed to do away with tax complications. Is there a simpler solution?

OR …

2. The fund is a wholly owned subsidiary of the bank taking the admin charge. Can’t they just increase the annual management charge and pass it on to the bank as commission or something?

Comments

  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 120,234 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    My so-called ethical investment fund has written to all members saying they will be introducing an annual service charge in addition to the present annual management charge. I understand that this is common but there are two mystifying aspects:

    That is not common.

    Fund houses do not put in place extra charges unless you are building their own investment platform. However, where they do that, they tend to move you to a clean share class that lowers the fund charge as well.
    1.We are told to contact HMRC about the capital gains tax implications since the bank will be taking the service charge from the fund and this will be a capital gain. This sounds unnecessarily complicated, and contrary to the whole idea of stocks and shares ISAs which are supposed to do away with tax complications. Is there a simpler solution?

    CGT would apply to any unwrapped holdings. If you hold them within a tax wrapper, then CGT would not be an issue.
    2. The fund is a wholly owned subsidiary of the bank taking the admin charge. Can’t they just increase the annual management charge and pass it on to the bank as commission or something?

    This sounds like a bank wanting to move you from bundled share classes to unbundled share classes held on a platform. Whilst legacy assets are allowed to continue to be held for the time being, there are pressures on firms to convert people to unbundled share classes. What you seem to want it the old way of undisclosed commissions. However, the industry has moved away from that and fees are in their place.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.