We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Credit Card allocation of payments

Hi all. I'm looking for clarification on how allocation of payments on credits card should work, as my card company haven't quite done it in the way I would have expected, and I may end up paying significant (and unnecessary) interest as a result.


Example (random figures):
At the end of month 1 the card balance breakdown is as follows:
  • Purchases (19%): £500
  • Balance Transfers (0%): £1000
During Month 2, a purchase of £1000 is made. Two weeks later (still within month 2), a payment of £1000 is made. I would have expected the balances at the end of month 2 to be to same as they were at the end of month 1 (i.e £1000 purchase cancelled out by the £1000 payment), but with me that wasn't the case.
They have used the first £500 of the payment to pay off the outstanding £500 purchases 'portion' from month 1, and the remaining £500 to reduce the balance transfer portion from £1000 to £500. They have then added the £1000 purchase back onto the purchases portion (at the high interest rate), even though the purchase was made a good two weeks before the payment.


So in a nutshell, at the end of month 2,


Expected:
  • Purchases (19%): £500 + £1000 - £1000 = £500
  • Balance Transfers (0%): £1000
Actual
  • Purchases (19%): £500 - £500 + £1000 = £1000
  • Balance Transfers (0%): £1000 - £500 = £500
Based on this, if I had waited an extra week or so to pay the £1000 off (within month 3 rather than month 2), it would have allocate the payment correctly and saved a lot of unnecessary interest. This seems is a bit shifty to me - is this standard practice?

Comments

  • Most card companies will apply the payments to statemented transactions first, which is what appears to have happened in your case.
  • molerat
    molerat Posts: 35,920 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    As above. You need to read and fully understand the payment allocation rules of your card. For your information MBNA would have done it as you expected but they are in the minority.
  • In my experience, most cards will use your payment to satisfy the amount(s) due on your last statement, then any new charges. Hence why if you take money out on your credit card, you need to pay both your last statement plus the amount you took out to avoid interest.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.