We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Property devaluation following murder
Comments
-
.... I don't think she would be found liable for not babysitting adults in the property. She's not responsible for the other person's actions. Also she's a single mother renting, do you think she has a 5 figure sum stashed away somewhere? probably not. This means that even if she was found liable, she probably can't pay you anyway.
Any tenant in a property is responsible for the actions of anybody they let into their property, or anybody who lets themselves in due to them leaving it insecure etc, such as having/leaving a party and leaving people on the premises.
It'd only not be her fault if she'd been randomly broken into and a place trashed.
As it is, she threw a party - left all sorts of dodgy characters whooping it up in there and waltzed off into the sunset leaving them to it. That's "responsible for...." covered.
Her fault ... her party ... her guests ... her choices .... her debt.
But, with this sort of chaotic and f3ck1ess lifestyle she won't have two halfpennies to rub together as it's all wasted on pointless partying and other such nonsense.0 -
Tell the EA to read Sykes v Taylor-Rose 2004."Real knowledge is to know the extent of one's ignorance" - Confucius0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards