Murray International Trust (MYI)

Sally57

MPN wrote: »

Thanks for your thoughts on this but I think I will keep TRG, HSL & BGS. This is not only for performance but I personally feel they work better individually with the different regions for smaller companies than a global small company trust.

Another vote for FCS, I can't really see the point in holding three separate regional small company trusts so I'd just go for FCS.

Chickereeeee

Sue58 wrote: »

I am looking at investing into a trust in the global equity income sector and quite like MYI, however although its performance over the past 10 years has been very good does anybody know why it has struggled a little over the past 5 year period in comparison to other global equity income trusts?

It is because I invested in it for the first time 5 years ago......

Enhance your returns by following what I do, and doing the opposite.

C

ArchBair

Sally57 wrote: »

Another vote for FCS, I can't really see the point in holding three separate regional small company trusts so I'd just go for FCS.

Agreed, that is very sensible in my opinion and cuts down on the overall trusts in your portfolio and the monitoring.

MPN

Sally57 wrote: »

Another vote for FCS, I can't really see the point in holding three separate regional small company trusts so I'd just go for FCS.

It appears a few posters feel I should hold FCS to generically cover global small companies. I will think about this further but as I already mentioned TRG, HSL & BGS have done well for me up to now but obviously I can also see the merits of just holding one general trust for global small companies. Food for thought...