We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
BW Legal - Offer Letter to Settle
Comments
-
Great to hear about the discontinuance, well done! BW Legal are so transparent and pathetically predictable that it's truly embarrassing!
Or it would be but they're so consistent in their incompetence that they must be 'unembarrassable'!0 -
Great to hear about the discontinuance, well done! BW Legal are so transparent and pathetically predictable that it's truly embarrassing!
Or it would be but they're so consistent in their incompetence that they must be 'unembarrassable'!
If only they were intelligent enough to even understand ?
Sadly they are not0 -
Sadly, any attempt to claim your costs up to discontinuance is likely to fail due to the above, and CPR 38.6(3)We have gone through the process of DQ and allocation to my local court etc.
"This rule does not apply to claims allocated to the small claims track."
In order for the court to even consider your costs claim you'd have to make an application and pay the correct fee of £255.
Until recently you could attempt to get round this by writing to/emailing the judge and asking them to issues a costs order, using their own 'discretionary' case management powers.
But it seems the HMCTS have cottoned on to this and issued instructions to the courts informing them that the decision to accept an application via letter/email, rather than the prescribed form (N244) is up to the judiciary but the decision to charge a fee is not. This lies solely with HMCTS - and court staff must collect the correct fee for all relevant applications. :undecided0 -
Sadly, any attempt to claim your costs up to discontinuance is likely to fail due to the above, and CPR 38.6(3)
"This rule does not apply to claims allocated to the small claims track."
In order for the court to even consider your costs claim you'd have to make an application and pay the correct fee of £255.
Until recently you could attempt to get round this by writing to/emailing the judge and asking them to issues a costs order, using their own 'discretionary' case management powers.
But it seems the HMCTS have cottoned on to this and issued instructions to the courts informing them that the decision to accept an application via letter/email, rather than the prescribed form (N244) is up to the judiciary but the decision to charge a fee is not. This lies solely with HMCTS - and court staff must collect the correct fee for all relevant applications. :undecided
Thanks for this, oh well I suppose I cant complain really I haven't had to pay a penny.0 -
There is no reason why you cannot complain to your MP and the MOJ however. PPCs are abusing the system and using the threat of court to get the gullible to pay up.You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Sadly, any attempt to claim your costs up to discontinuance is likely to fail due to the above, and CPR 38.6(3)
"This rule does not apply to claims allocated to the small claims track."
In order for the court to even consider your costs claim you'd have to make an application and pay the correct fee of £255.
Until recently you could attempt to get round this by writing to/emailing the judge and asking them to issues a costs order, using their own 'discretionary' case management powers.
But it seems the HMCTS have cottoned on to this and issued instructions to the courts informing them that the decision to accept an application via letter/email, rather than the prescribed form (N244) is up to the judiciary but the decision to charge a fee is not. This lies solely with HMCTS - and court staff must collect the correct fee for all relevant applications. :undecided
But do we think all local courts have even read that, and isn't it worth trying a letter anyway, Lamilad?PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0 -
Certainly doesn't cost anything to send an email/ letter. I'm not sure any court would not take notice of guidance issued by HMCTS.But do we think all local courts have even read that, and isn't it worth trying a letter anyway, Lamilad
I think the op will receive a reply similar to this one:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/gdp928w4oj852l6/FB_IMG_1505951544195.jpg?dl=00 -
Interesting! I still reckon I would try the letter anyway, for the sake of a stamp!PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
