We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Returning to work after maternity impossible

13»

Comments

  • sangie595
    sangie595 Posts: 6,092 Forumite
    Kayalana99 wrote: »
    I think her point is they are making it not worth it. Since they give you £x amount to sit on her bum, really you'd think they would make it in favour for people to go to work. I appreciate this sort-of counters what I just said in a way, but the government aren't really helping Mother's back into work since they just pay them to stay at home the same as they would at work pratically.
    Why should "they" make it worthwhile? There are plenty of unemployed. So if the OP wants to sit around on her bum on benefits and lose all her employment skills, ensuring that she and her child are headed for a life of poverty, who are we to get in her way? "They" are every taxpayer, and why would be want to pay her to have children AND work, and probably end up better off than plenty of people paying the taxes!
    Kayalana99 wrote: »
    Your confused here, she would be in a substantial worse position then before she had the baby, but not much better off then what she is now if she returned to work rather then stayed at home.
    No. I think it's you that is confused. She didn't have to get pregnant. She didn't have to have the baby. These are choices she made. Her, and presumably somebody else. Why should we pay for her to make those choices and also work? Having children costs money. For a long time. Are you suggesting that the OP was too stupid to understand that? Did she genuinely think that the rest of us would pay for her lifestyle? And she'd be better off?

    It's a crying shame that producing children doesn't make you wealthy so that you have to expect everyone else to pay for you. And even more regrettable that the stress of everyone else not paying for the child means that one's mental health is at risk. Do I detect yet another benefit claim in the making?

    This is the sort of thing that gives the majority of benefit claimants a bad name.
  • No sympathy here...... should have thought about this before you had your baby.

    Where is the father in all of this?

    God help yet another child.
  • Andrea1589 wrote: »
    I am at my wits end. I have recently had a new baby and am desperate to return to work. I was earning 330 a week before maternity i am now earning 140 pw smp. Having spoke to tax credits i have learned by going back to work i would get 25 pw childcare help for a 165 pw bill plus my tax credits will drop by 40 pw. It basically means by going back to work 40 hours to my original job i would be 10 pound a week better off. I dont understand this. They are making it impossible for me to return to work and having worked all my life this is really taking a toll on my mental state. If anyone can offer advice or anyone in a simaler situation can advise that would be greatly appreciated.
    Take your pick luv.

    Its good to have a choice.
  • Arshad_00 wrote: »
    Take your pick luv.

    Its good to have a choice.

    Out of DT Flame And

    You know what happens. :D
  • Alter_ego
    Alter_ego Posts: 3,842 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    bigbulldog wrote: »
    I wonder if the op will return to her thread considering the responses she has had which have been sound advise,but probably not what she wanted to hear.:)

    I think she may have returned and reported a post I made which has been removed. I made a comment similar to many here regarding being subsidised by taxpayers.
    I am not a cat (But my friend is)
  • Alter_ego wrote: »
    I think she may have returned and reported a post I made which has been removed. I made a comment similar to many here regarding being subsidised by taxpayers.

    Likely because the forum rules are to give advice on benefit entitlement and not your opinion on whether it's right or wrong.
  • elsien
    elsien Posts: 36,590 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Likely because the forum rules are to give advice on benefit entitlement and not your opinion on whether it's right or wrong.

    True, but that was being strictly adhere to there'd be far less posts on here. Which does yet again make me wonder why some posts are removed and not others saying fairly similar things.
    All shall be well, and all shall be well, and all manner of things shall be well.

    Pedant alert - it's could have, not could of.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.