We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
complying with Larke v Nugus
Options
Comments
-
Yorkshireman99 wrote: »I think the complainent's bluff needs to be called. If they want o chalenge the will they are going to have to put money up front to do so.
And if they are going to make a challenge, they will need a sizable chunk of money to do so - Something in the region of £40K or maybe as much as £100K.
The cheap way of frustrating a will is to lodge a caveat and then "make an appearance". If the complainant refuses to remove the caveat, the executors either have the choice of taking (expensive) legal action to have it removed or acquiesce to the demands.Her courage will change the world.
Treasure the moments that you have. Savour them for as long as you can for they will never come back again.0 -
I have asked the complainants solicitors what steps they are taking to ensure fraud won't be perpetrated by their client, also asked whether they have asked their client, if their client knows of any Trust or Will since made, in the last eight years, (covering the period of Alzhiemers). I don't expect a reply though, as they appear to be only interested in creating work for themselves, under the guise of L v N.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.5K Spending & Discounts
- 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards