We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Stamp duty when combining two properties
Comments
-
I agree that interpreting the provisions of Finance Act 2003 Schedule 4ZA, the 3% surcharge is due in this case.
HMRC take this view too, see their November 2016 guidance on additional properties, chapter 9 example 12.0 -
Is your property mortgage free? If so there may be options available to avoid additional stamp duty, if it's payable, by temporarily transferring your main residence to someone else for no consideration.0
-
But SDLT would then be due when the property is transferred back to the OP.0
-
Yes but SDLT is based on the consideration not the value of the property, so if that consideration was very small, say £100, then stamp duty is not very much.0
-
If they're linked transactions (which they obviously are) then SDLT is based on market value, not consideration.
HMRC aren't stupid.0 -
That's not what linked transaction means and even if they were, then the SDLT is based on the consideration and not on marke value.0
-
There are a lot of people guessing here! The SDLT laws are complex and very broadly drafted (in order to be able to defeat all these avoidance schemes).
When you purchase the second property, SDLT as a second residence will be due. There is no way to buy the second and instantly combine it with the first.
When you combine the two properties, try to ask for a refund. I suspect you will get little sympathy from HMRC.0 -
this is complex
You shoudl get proper advice on this as there may be a way of structuring the transaction to avoid (not evade) the additional charge, should one be payable. Presumably you will own the freehold at completion? if not, have you dealt with landlord's consent about consolidating the properties?
if you do own the freehold you may be able to surrender the leases in a way that ensures your legal ownership continues in one property only - but that will need some thinking through. This isnt a question for the amateurs. but worth exploring given the potential saving.0 -
Not sure why this thread has been resurrected - I think we reached the correct answer over a year ago.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards