We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Inheritance Give Away Letter

In a will if the whole of the estate is left to two relatives only to be shared equally (relative A and relative B). A and B are also named as executors of the will.
However, relative A does not want to be an executor and will allow relative B to be the sole executor. Relative A also does not wish to inherit any money held in bank accounts by the deceased; but instead allow relative B to inherit all of the money. How would you word a letter which states this. Would one of the following be suitable?






I relative A do not wish to inherit any money from the deceased; instead I want relative B to inherit all of the money


or should it be


I relative A do not want inherit any money from the deceased; instead I want relative B to inherit my half of the money.


Or any other suggestions?

Comments

  • oshoshitzu wrote: »
    In a will if the whole of the estate is left to two relatives only to be shared equally (relative A and relative B). A and B are also named as executors of the will.
    However, relative A does not want to be an executor and will allow relative B to be the sole executor. Relative A also does not wish to inherit any money held in bank accounts by the deceased; but instead allow relative B to inherit all of the money. How would you word a letter which states this. Would one of the following be suitable?






    I relative A do not wish to inherit any money from the deceased; instead I want relative B to inherit all of the money


    or should it be


    I relative A do not want inherit any money from the deceased; instead I want relative B to inherit my half of the money.


    Or any other suggestions?
    Executor A simply declines to act on the probate application. A needs to execute a deed of variation declining to accept the legacy. Note that this will not avoid the declined legacy being counted in any calculation of means tested benefits.
  • getmore4less
    getmore4less Posts: 46,882 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper I've helped Parliament
    Not being executor is simple, the other one applies on their own a can reserve power to act as a backup.

    If A wants to give up all of their share ther are three options
    gift - as long as it won't cause IHT issues for A
    disclaimer - if B would inherit see below.
    DOV - if B would not inherit from a disclaimer


    a simple disclaimer may be the most appropriate way as long as the will is written in a way that B would inherit and not some other person.

    with a disclaimer you are treated to have died just before the testator and the will process the disclaimed share on that basis, S33 applies.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.1K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.2K Life & Family
  • 260.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.