We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
60% return in 12 months - can it continue.
Comments
-
sevenhills wrote: »I find it interesting though, perhaps I should try to work out my gains/losses? But since shares are higher now than 20 years ago

Barclays stockbrokers have a very useful feature - they show how your portfolio has performed compared to the index (FTSE all share IIRC). I'm ussually about 2% ahead which i'm more than pleased with.
I suspect most brokers don't offer this as most clients will find out they don't beat the market and will switch to low cost trackers - or am I being too cynical?0 -
Its boom time my dear, and you don't realise that. The reasons for the rekindled boom are many and varied, but rhyme with what the boom that busted ten years ago were founded on........A part of me thinks, why not just ramp it up, just buy as much as I can but I have a feeling this is all just luck; a few of the tips have been dire and I have lost 90% of their value, most havent moved but a few have really flown, but there is no logic to this
Time to do some research and find out. It seems you have had the common sense to realise that a magic fairy isn't sprinkling seeds from the money tree in your garden.
You need to learn how to spot the signs of events going the other way. It's not rocket science. Next thing you know, someone's going to advise you to prepare for a crash and buy gold..._0 -
I did some research into the profits / losses that Retail FX traders make and how that maps to random trading. A 60% return could be just one of the outcomes on a distribution curve of random trading. Bank the profits and try again. If you get another 60% in year 2, that's potential evidence that your results are more than just luck! If you lose 60%, well you still have the profits from the first year!
Good luck!"For every complicated problem, there is always a simple, wrong answer"0 -
sevenhills wrote: »But since shares are higher now than 20 years ago

Are they all? Some all still well short. BT for example are well off their peak price.0 -
You know statistically, if you flip a coin long enough, you WILL get 10 heads in a row. Maybe he is that 10 heads in the row.
I worry that there is a larger group of people who have followed a similar strategy, but chosen different stocks, and made substantial losses, but they won't be posting here.0 -
I worry that there is a larger group of people who have followed a similar strategy, but chosen different stocks, and made substantial losses, but they won't be posting here.
Yes that is a valid point. That's what's called Survival Bias. Only the successful stories are paraded around. No one listens to the people who fail or struggle.
I wholely recommend this book: The Art of Thinking Clearly to help point out useful concepts to help with investing or just generally in life.
Save 12K in 2020 # 38 £0/£20,0000
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.1K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
