We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House of Fraser voucher - returns

Hi all,
I'm an avid reader of the posts on MSE but I haven't yet felt the need to post my own... until now.

I had a gift voucher for House of Fraser. I needed some shoes. I knew which ones I wanted and bought them online from HoF, using my voucher. (Stupidly) I added 2 more pairs on to my order, and paid for those with cash, as I wanted to try some on that I'd seen on their website but wasn't sure they would be suitable. They weren't.

I returned the unsuitable shoes and later got an email to tell me I had a refund for a small amount. I contacted HoF to question why the refund was so low and they said that my gift voucher card had been refunded (which I had now disposed of) and the last few pounds sent back to my bank card. I explained I only ever wanted to spend the voucher.

A few emails back and forth have given me links to terms and conditions (given 3 links, 2 of which didn't actually lead to anything, the other didn't really explain anything). Apparently it's their policy to refund to the gift voucher first. Surely this can't be legal?! It just seems totally underhand and immoral, and in all honestly, feels like they've actually stolen my money from me.

They've certainly lost me as a future customer - I'll happily take my purchasing elsewhere. But I still can't get over the fact this is ok... is it?!

Comments

  • Fosterdog
    Fosterdog Posts: 4,948 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    While frustrating it is perfectly standard practice with most retailers and perfectly legal.

    In future it is always worth ordering on two different transactions if you are using a voucher and planning to return at least part of the order.
  • pinkshoes
    pinkshoes Posts: 20,609 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    In which case, return the whole lot, then re purchase the pair you want using the gift voucher.

    This is quite normal to refund the gift voucher first I'm afraid.
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • Kayaybee
    Kayaybee Posts: 5 Forumite
    Ok, thanks for replying. Just proves how long ago I worked in retail or had a voucher to use. Just seems so very wrong and crazy that I should have done two separate orders to do what I needed. The packaging, the effort, the way of making sure my money is kept... ah well, I'll not shop there again!
  • mije1983
    mije1983 Posts: 3,665 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Name Dropper
    Kayaybee wrote: »
    I'll not shop there again!

    So you will waste the money on the voucher then? Nose, spite, face situation really.

    Pinkshoes' suggestion makes sense assuming you do still like the shoes.
  • Korkyb
    Korkyb Posts: 634 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 9 August 2017 at 5:31AM
    Kayaybee wrote: »
    ah well, I'll not shop there again!



    You'll have to stop shopping everywhere as I think all/most retailers do this.


    I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong (which would be usual) but I think it may be to prevent credit card fraud (?? they may have to do it by law).


    If this system wasn't used a gift voucher could be bought with a stolen / dodgy credit card, an item purchased with the gift voucher then the item taken back for a refund.


    The store would effectively be acting as a "fence" giving 100% of the fraudulently obtained items value in cash to the tea leaf.


    You know it makes sense ;-)
    Was it really "everybody" that was Kung Fu fighting ???
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.