We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Want to become a Forum Ambassador? Visit the Community Noticeboard for details on how to apply

How much will fees hurt me?

13»

Comments

  • Glen_Clark
    Glen_Clark Posts: 4,397 Forumite
    edited 3 August 2017 at 6:33AM
    ColdIron wrote: »
    I suppose that if the OP followed the advice to exchange his multi asset fund including fixed income and equities in geographies covering Europe and Japan through to China and Mexico for one in only North American equities he would need to consider it was worth a reduction in fees of less than two tenths of a percent. Just thinking aloud

    How do you get 0.67% minus 0.07% to be 'less than two tenths of a percent'?

    I don't know whether the other investments you quote will do better than the worldwide companies headquartered in North America. But after such a reduction in fees it seems unlikely to me.
    PS: I have further diversified by putting some in other low charging ETFs (UK and Europe with charges up to 0.12%).
    “It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair
  • Let’s say you invest £2 in 2 funds (£ 1 in each) tracking the same index, and let’s suppose that they both reinvest dividends (no distributions), and that there are no fixed fees, trading fees (there is no trading other than the initial investment), upfront fees etc – only a % annual fee.
    After y years, your net return with fund 1 will be:
    (1+r)^y x (1-f1)^y , where f1 is the fee of fund1 and r is the return of the index.
    The net return with fund 2 will be:
    (1+r)^y x (1-f2)^y

    The return with fund 1 will be: (1-f1)^y / (1-f2)^y – 1 higher/lower than with fund 2.

    Some examples:

    fund1 charges 0.5%, fund 2 charges 0.3%, and you invest for 10 years ---> the return with fund 1 will be ca. 2% lower ( = (1-0.5%)^10 / (1-0.3%)^10-1 = 1.99% ).

    Fund1 charges 1% (what many stakeholder pensions charge), fund 2 charges 0.35%, you invest for 20 years --> the fund 1 return will be 12.27% lower.

    Note that:
    • The return of the underlying index being tracked is irrelevant
    • These calculations apply if you invest a sum now and don’t add to your investment; if you invest a given sum every month the numbers will be different
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    It's still a loss of 11% of your final capital sum, you might be cool with that but many won't be

    Buy shares directly and avoid fees altogether.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.3K Life & Family
  • 261K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.