📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

advice on legal issue to do with mortgage

Options
hi, i remortgaged my house 1 1/2 years ago with different lender. i used their lawyers for conveyancing and they were rubbish took ages to complete everything. so i was surprised to get letter from same solicitor this week saying that they didn't have a Standard Security for my mortgage and would i kindly sign and return the enclosed one. Now it's a legal document requiring to be witnessed. The Standard Security is the mortgage deed in scotland i think. anyone know what this means? how serious is it that they don't have this. to be honest i don't even remember signing anything at the time which i did think was odd:confused:

Comments

  • anyone got any idea???
  • I'm not a lawyer.
    What I think it means is that the solicitor messed up, and that the mortgage lender does not have any hold on the property. So it is possible that if you are in arrears, they cannot reposess your house, or legally collect the entire debt.
    Consult a solicitor. today.
    I am a Mortgage adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • Dan_Collins_2
    Dan_Collins_2 Posts: 1,377 Forumite
    Although being solicitors they have no come back as they own the law society and do what they like!

    I would sign it and return it. May be worth checking with a solicitor but I guess he will say the same. I would also report this to the lender, as a broker I get fed up with free legals ending in poor service!
    :confused:
  • it wasn't free legal. It was the one the mortgage company recommended, they used it too. but I paid.
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 49,648 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    Although it may be fun to say that you have been advised not to sign it as you are better off without it, the lenders response will probably be to say they will demand repayment of the mortgage. Although they have no charge on the property, a court would side with them as it was clearly an error/ omission. To continue to borrow the money without a charge, you should be paying an unsecured rate.

    Only way you will benefit is if you want to remortgage to a different lender at the moment. Then you could repay the loan and walk away with no ERC I imagine.

    You could tell them that you will need to take legal advice before signing and ask them to pay for the cost of this.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
  • Spudwud
    Spudwud Posts: 31 Forumite
    This is something thats more common that you think. Basically you have them over a barrel, I've known people to run up 5+yrs of arrears while these issues get resolved due to the solicitors failing to do their job properly and the lending going ahead without the lenders charge actually being registered on the property.
    I am a Mortgage Adviser
    You should note that this site doesn't check my status as a Mortgage Adviser, so you need to take my word for it. This signature is here as I follow MSE's Mortgage Adviser Code of Conduct. Any posts on here are for information and discussion purposes only and shouldn't be seen as financial advice.
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,791 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ... in the meantime, that 5 years of arrears is recorded on your credit file and blows any chance of getting any further credit or future mortgages.

    Whilst they may not be able to resposses using conventional means, they could call in the ballifs and create all sorts of difficulties for you.

    The Courts would side with the lender as it would be obvious that it was a clerical error and that you were trying to get something you were not entitled to.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • I was never proposing doing something like that, I was just puzzled as to what it means.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.