We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Compulsory building insurance

Hi
In 1966 my wife and I took out a joint mortgage with a building society. We moved house twice and eventually paid it off in 2001. Throughout that period the building society insisted that the buildings insurance cover was supplied by them. When I last challenged this ( just before I decided to close it) it was £100 more than avalaible on the open market. I pay less now than they charged in 2001.
Whilst not falling into the ppi claim scheme I consider that their tie up with Norwich Union was probably more to their benefit than mine and a restrictive practice.
I reckon this cost me a lot of money over 35 years.
Comments and advice welcome.

Comments

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 26,612 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I doubt you'll get anywhere with a complaint now.

    You originally took this insurance out 51 years ago.

    Do you have documentary proof that you were always prevented from sourcing a cheaper policy elsewhere?

    Was the insurance simply renewed each year without you ever questioning it?
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 121,263 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Whilst not falling into the ppi claim scheme I consider that their tie up with Norwich Union was probably more to their benefit than mine and a restrictive practice.

    You are wrong. Even today, they are allowed to tie up with their chosen insurer.
    Comments and advice welcome.

    1966 is 39 years prior to regulation. The rules on restrictions didnt change until the 90s. No case here.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.4K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.