IAS Appeal - help needed

Umkomaas

LauraV wrote: »

Thank you so much for your help. Il let you know how it goes

Please do. There are many who milk every drop of detailed advice, given entirely by volunteers for free in their own time, and who just seemingly do not have the basic courtesy to update us on the final outcome of their case.

Take all, give nowt back Britain! Sod 'em, now I'm sorted!

(Rant over!).

Good luck with your appeal to the (not so) Independent Appeals Service.

LauraV_2

So the parking company have submitted their evidence which is basically just all the photographs and the same response which I had in my appeal rejection letter.
Do I respond? Shall I mention my lease as my counter argument?

Coupon-mad

Just reiterate that their case is fatally flawed by the wrong location on the PCN which cannot be considered properly given under any applicable law, or rule of contract law, nor is it even close to being compliant with the IPC Code of Practice.

Did they include a copy of the PCN with the wrong location on it or have they side-stepped providing it?

If they didn't show the NTD, I would show the IAS a copy and say it appears the parking company withheld it from evidence to hide the fact the location on it was 15 miles away.

LauraV_2

They did actually include a copy of it with the wrong location. Il write and reply and then see what you think

LauraV_2

How's this?

The case submitted by Parking & Property Management Ltd (PPM) is fatally flawed by the wrong location being recorded on the PCN. This cannot be considered properly given under any applicable law of rule of contract law nor is it even close to being compliant with the IPC Code of Practice.

In addition to which the lease for my property states: 'Schedule 3.1 - The right for the leaseholder and all persons authorised by the leaseholder (in common with all other persons entitled to the like right) at all times to use the Common Parts for all purposes incidental to the occupation and enjoyment of the premises and the visitors parking space (but not further or otherwise)'
At no point does the lease refer to having to display a valid permit and the lease has precedence over the parking scheme due to primacy of contract. The terms of the lease cannot be varied by PPM and if a variation of contract has been made, there is not written notification to prove that I agreed to it.

Coupon-mad

Just a typo which was my fault, should be:

under any applicable law, or rule of contract law,