Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Buyers Market?

13

Comments

  • snickpan
    snickpan Posts: 171 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 100 Posts Name Dropper
    I see. So mortgage debt will no longer be taken into account, you'll just be taxed on your rental income, whether you're massively mortgaged or not.
  • lisyloo
    lisyloo Posts: 30,077 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    snickpan wrote: »
    I see. So mortgage debt will no longer be taken into account, you'll just be taxed on your rental income, whether you're massively mortgaged or not.


    Strictly speaking it's the COST of mortgage debt - but yes in general it's makes things worse for BTL - some scenarios more than others.


    That article says that an unintended consequence is higher rents, but misses the point that some markets cannot withstand higher rents and another unintended consequence is BTL landlords selling their properties if the whole proposition is simply not worth it anymore.


    Clearly there are a number of factors for example


    the amount of debt and the cost of it
    the ability of the local market to withstand rises (and whether you want to change tenant or increase the rent on loyal tenants)
    whether you are a limited company or not


    Some landlords won't be that badly affected, but overall I think it can be seen as negative for BTL generally.
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    snickpan wrote: »
    I see. So mortgage debt will no longer be taken into account, you'll just be taxed on your rental income, whether you're massively mortgaged or not.

    No quite. The impact is on those that pay higher rate tax on their income.
  • Property and rents still falling in London.

    There are the official figures which are manipulated,

    then there are the real numbers that people familiar can easily see, we keep a close eye on the market around here, and there are many places empty for a while, and price keeps going down but they are still vacant.
    The thing about chaos is, it's fair.
  • Everybody loves these programs on TV about nightmare landlords and tenants from hell

    its so difficult to get bad tenants out these days, and you know they will trash the place if they are unhappy

    many times the landlord pays them hundreds of pounds to leave quietly without taking a hammer to the walls etc
    The thing about chaos is, it's fair.
  • The-Joker wrote: »
    Property and rents still falling in London.

    Not in my personal experience. One of my flats in Clapham Junction has just come up for renewal. The tenants didn't bat an eyelid at a 3% rise.
  • Thrugelmir wrote: »
    No quite. The impact is on those that pay higher rate tax on their income.

    Not quite.

    The tax efficiency is still in place for those buying through a limited company, which my wife and I are looking at currently.

    We are also consideringkeeping it out side a company by putting 99% of the ownership into her name, as she is a nontaxpayer, while I pay tax at 45%

    In both cases, the tax treatment is far more sensible.
  • fizio
    fizio Posts: 428 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Combo Breaker
    caronoel wrote: »
    Not quite.

    The tax efficiency is still in place for those buying through a limited company, which my wife and I are looking at currently.

    We are also consideringkeeping it out side a company by putting 99% of the ownership into her name, as she is a nontaxpayer, while I pay tax at 45%

    In both cases, the tax treatment is far more sensible.

    I have already gone down Ltd company route as the 99% option had implications for mortgage lending
  • Conrad
    Conrad Posts: 33,137 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    The-Joker wrote: »
    Everybody loves these programs on TV about nightmare landlords and tenants from hell

    its so difficult to get bad tenants out these days, and you know they will trash the place if they are unhappy

    many times the landlord pays them hundreds of pounds to leave quietly without taking a hammer to the walls etc




    Which is why for example I just spent 6 weeks taking tenant enquiries until I was satisfied I had the right one.
    I merely pay an Agent to advertise only, I do everything else myself.


    Agents always say I'm uber-fussy, but it's worth the extra effort IMO.


    Essentially what I look for is for want of a better word 'meek' quiet sensible rule abiding types.


    I see over and again LL's settling for the type of profile that just screams trouble, it's just so unnecessary.


    A great way to filter out all the transients, chippy types, roughens and vacant people is to ask them to forward 3 months Bank stats, POID, POA, Payslips and P60 -


    I come from a mortgage business background and can spot 'a waster' a fifty paces
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.