NOW OPEN: the MSE Forum 'Ask An Expert' event. This time we'd like your questions on TRAVEL & HOLIDAY DEALS. Post by Wed and deals expert MSE Oli will answer as many as he can.
MSE News: Regulator proposes cap on energy prices for vulnerable customers

418 Posts

An energy price cap for vulnerable customers could be introduced as part of a raft of Ofgem proposals - but energy switching sites will no longer have to show you ALL the tariffs you can switch to by default, following a U-turn by the regulator...
Read the full story:
'Regulator proposes cap on energy prices for vulnerable customers'

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
'Regulator proposes cap on energy prices for vulnerable customers'

Click reply below to discuss. If you haven’t already, join the forum to reply. If you aren’t sure how it all works, read our New to Forum? Intro Guide.
Read the latest MSE News
Flag up a news story: [email protected]
Get the Free Martin's Money Tips E-mail
Flag up a news story: [email protected]
Get the Free Martin's Money Tips E-mail
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
This ruling will not make any difference to us 'anoraks' who know the score. However surely the purpose of the the changes is to cater for the less knowledgeable customer and, by omitting some tariffs, this will enable some websites to 'steer' them toward commission earning tariffs.
I don't see this as helping consumers. Only lining the pockets of switching sites more.
We "anoraks" will have to ensure that any switching site that does this is despicable practice is widely condemned.
I seem to remember when Ofgem made the rule about suppliers only having 4 tariffs, the findings of the CMA investigation included making them reverse that.
Do Ofgem want to look as useless as Ofcom again?
I agree this is step backwards towards helping the less knowledgeable customer.
Is anyone a prepayment customer? It would be interesting to know what level of cap was put in place, given the variables of capping.
Barney - It just got up and went.
Carpe diem
That's what I said when they first started talking about it. Us who pay our dues always seem to be paying for those who can't or won't put some effort in.
I'll accept that there are those who have a real problem either physical or mental who need help, but I really do object to paying for those who put leccy, gass, rent and other essentials below having SKY, a posh mobile, cigarettes, drinks or even holidays.
I'm afraid a lot of the do-gooders just reinforce their sense of injustice and entitlement and I do include Martin in this as well
It's been 'watered down' to 2.2 / 2.6 million "vulnerable" customers, who currently receive the warm home discount.
For that you should be thankful?
Given the qualifying criteria to receive the WHD in the first place, these really are the most "vulnerable" in society. Do we begrudge help to those most in need? I'm sure there are many who would qualify who never receive the discount - i.e. don't know about it, too proud to apply, the scheme closes when quotas are filled etc........
But you're right, consumers will see their energy bills rise as energy companies recoup the cost of the cap?
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/jul/03/uk-energy-watchdog-ofgem-plan-price-cap-stitch-up
Barney - It just got up and went.
Carpe diem