Does the Cargius case still stand

ShropshireL4d

Thanks Umkomaas for your swift reply.
Firstly apologies for my lack of attention to detail.
The company is Premier Park Limited.
Should we send another letter to both stating the Cargius case and maybe ask why they do not think it is relevant?
Thanks.

waamo

Know your enemy http://www.bmpa.eu/companydata/Premier_Park.html

Umkomaas

The company is Premier Park Limited.

Right, finally (hopefully!) we've got the right marine! Too much time spent chasing ParkingEye shadows previously.

Premier Parking Ltd have become more litigious this year compared to the previous two years. So it now seems a case of wait and see what they do next. Come back if you get a LBA or real court papers.

ShropshireL4d

We have now received a Notice of Intended Court Action from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd.
My wife, whose car it was (we have since sold the vehicle), is pressing me to pay.
We have been on holiday and only opened the letter yesterday, though it was dated 14 August.
They are asking us to pay £150 by 28.8.2017. Obviously we have missed this.
They are again stating the Supreme Court judgement of Nov 2015.
Should I reply with my continued stance that the Cargius case has more bearing on this case?
Thanks in advance

KeithP

Time for you to re-read this post:

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=64350614&postcount=4

The first line of which is: IGNORE THE DEBT COLLECTORS' STAGE

Umkomaas

That's not a LBA. Do a Google/forum search on 'Notice of Intended Court Action Debt Recovery Plus' and see how many hundreds of others are ignoring this garbage.

Only come back if you get a (real) LBA from Premier or their Solicitors or real court papers.

Now is most certainly not the time to consider paying anyone!

beamerguy

ShropshireL4d wrote: »

We have now received a Notice of Intended Court Action from Debt Recovery Plus Ltd.
My wife, whose car it was (we have since sold the vehicle), is pressing me to pay.
We have been on holiday and only opened the letter yesterday, though it was dated 14 August.
They are asking us to pay £150 by 28.8.2017. Obviously we have missed this.
They are again stating the Supreme Court judgement of Nov 2015.
Should I reply with my continued stance that the Cargius case has more bearing on this case?
Thanks in advance

This is just DRP playing children again.:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:
They have this big pram and are constantly throwing their toys out

DRP ARE TOTAL POWERLESS and their threats are worthless.

Someone should send a copy of the Beavis case to DRP and
ask them to read it before making fake claims.

THE BEAVIS CASE WAS ABOUT "THE CHARGE IS UNFAIR"

This is just DRP utter rubbish who are trying to extort money
from you ..... DRP = IGNORE = NO CONTACT = BIN IT

OR .... if you feel inclined, send it to Trading Standards with
a complaint that they are making false claims

ShropshireL4d

Thanks to all replies and support so far.
Just to update, now received reduced final settlement offer of £127.50 to avoid court action.
The only action taken is to file it with the others and post on here.

ShropshireL4d

Latest development.
Received letter from Zenith Collections - Settlement figure reduced to £99.99.

beamerguy

ShropshireL4d wrote: »

Latest development.
Received letter from Zenith Collections - Settlement figure reduced to £99.99.

Zenith are indeed desperate, if the amount is going down, they
might well be paying you soon.

IGNORE THEM, they will give up and pass it back to the PPC
and then you wait to see if the PPC or their legals has a
suitable case to bring ?

The problem as from the 1st Oct for the PPC and their legals
is can they comply to the new claim procedures ???