We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
I'm assuming this is is possible - am I right?
Comments
-
Glen_Clark wrote: »Are our life savings safer in Sterling cash, or in a tracker divided between thousands of the world's biggest companies each possibly more solvent than the UK Government?
Is that a rhetorical question ? If not you'd have to define "safe" and over what timescale. The fact it's your life savings is somewhat irrelevant, it's what you plan to do with them and when that matters when answering questions like that.0 -
No it isn't a rhetorical question. The fact that its life savings is relevant in that we can't plan what to do with them because we could be dead tomorrow or live another 50 years.AnotherJoe wrote: »The fact it's your life savings is somewhat irrelevant, it's what you plan to do with them and when that matters when answering questions like that.
We can only hope for the best.
Holding all your savings in sterling feels to me like holding them all in one company.“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.” --Upton Sinclair0 -
Glen_Clark wrote: »No it isn't a rhetorical question. The fact that its life savings is relevant in that we can't plan what to do with them.
That still doesn't help. Do you need to live off this money for 50 years ? Or would it be icing on the cake money for holidays and such, or needed to provide basic income?
Is it money to bridge between being retired and pensions coming on stream in 5 years, or does it have to last you all 50 years providing an income ..The point being, if its short term then Sterling risk by which you really mean inflation risk, is irrelevant. Long term, being invested in the stock markets is really the only way to cope.
Well,the fact it's your life savings is irrelevant to what you decide to spend the money on over what timescale. It could equally have been a lottery win or an inheritance.Glen_Clark wrote: »No it isn't a rhetorical question. The fact that its life savings is relevant in that we can't plan what to do with them because we could be dead tomorrow or live another 50 years..
As to your comment that you might die tomorrow or in 50 years that equally applied whilst you were saving it, so what's the difference now? What were you saving it for ?Glen_Clark wrote: »Holding all your savings in sterling feels to me like holding them all in one company.
well in that case invest in multiple global companies, e.g. put the money Ina global fund. Though that still doesn't help unless you decide what your aim for the money is. Is it for descendants or meant to provide income but retain the same size or will you gradually spend it down?
Bottom line what matters is your goals.
.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
